Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24647 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2001 10:31:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 20 Mar 2001 10:31:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 7237 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2001 10:31:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 20 Mar 2001 10:31:24 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14fJKu-00012L-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:25:56 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from [213.2.16.106] (helo=rsgb.org.uk) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14fJKt-00012G-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:25:55 +0000 Received: from miked by rsgb.org.uk with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.7.5.R) for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:24:13 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:24:11 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: WOLF: Success and failure Message-ID: <3AB72FCB.11916.3A0834@localhost> X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Return-Path: miked@mail Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: I tried out WOLF for the first time last night with total success. Jim was sending GY(^%? JGGF, followed by H(*^RCKO KKl, followed by . . . . OK, so it wasn't quite as successful as I would have liked. My first problem was finding the Command Prompt (pseudo DOS) on Windows ME. After 20 minutes, I located it under Programs, Accessories!! I then successfully generated a test signal (WAV file) and 'received' it 100% as per the instructions. So WOLF is easy after all. Now for the big test - real RF. Jim came up with his test transmission and I recorded it using Spectrogram but this didn't work. The problem seems to be that WOLF needs a sample rate of 8kb, and Spectrogram doesn't do this rate. An hour later, I used Cool Edit (a nice program) to generate a usable WAV file of Jim's signal. Several hours later I gave up, having failed to read anything at all from Jim. Possible causes: Jim's signal is very strong so possible sound card level problem. Also I may have been a long way off frequency (see below). Will test further tonight. Getting the correct audio frequency proved difficult and I only fixed it this morning after breakfast. I can use BBC 198kHz to calibrate Argo to measure a 136kHz signal to much better than 1Hz, but could not find an easy way of measuring 800Hz!! First I believed the Argo readout at 800Hz, but later tests showed this to be a long way out (this is not a complaint against Argo). I finally listened to DBF38 on AM and beat my DDS against it, then used the resultant 800Hz beat note to calibrate Argo. Later I found the offset facility on my IC-706. This sets the audio frequency for comfortable CW reception - normally about 400Hz. Setting this to 800Hz gave me 800Hz audio to within half a Hertz with the RF dial set to the correct frequency. Now why didn't I think of that in the first place? Some thoughts on WOLF: It looks very useful and I think it may well be the mode for the 2001/2002 DX season (though I will still run CW and QRSS). The command line is hard work and needs a lot of interpretation. I am sure there are programmers out there who could provide an easy display with 'switches' and 'dials', and some automation of the variables to optimise reception. Transmit is a bigger problem if you cannot generate high power SSB at 136kHz. Jim has cracked the problem with his Decca (Class D), and I look forward to him publishing his modulator circuit. His signal is VERY clean with me only a few km away. We will need to devise a protocol for QSOs. We will also need to find a way of having 'random' QSOs. At present the frequency must be known accurately in advance and monitored for a very long time. This is not viable if you don't know there is someone transmitting. I find WOLF fascinating and challenging, whilst - at least on receive - not needing huge amounts of work to get going. I hope Jim will continue his test transmissions to get more people set up. Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.lf.thersgb.net