Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20512 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2001 23:35:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Mar 2001 23:35:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 9546 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2001 23:35:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 16 Mar 2001 23:35:57 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14e3g3-0005Ti-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 23:30:35 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from finch-post-11.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.39]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14e3g2-0005Td-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 23:30:34 +0000 Received: from alg.demon.co.uk ([194.222.171.80]) by finch-post-11.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 14e3fh-000K5R-0B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 23:30:13 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3AB29557.49556C59@alg.demon.co.uk> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 22:36:07 +0000 From: "Steve Rawlings" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: "Wolf" BPSK tests anyone? References: <5337.200103161327@gemini> <005701c0ae34$b88796c0$f29201d5@dave> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dave G3YMC wrote: > May I politely remind us all that the agreed band plan is for data to be in > the 137.4-137.6 range. Use of slow CW below 136.0 (band plan beacon > section) has seemed to have become common for transatlantic qsos, but there > is no reason to continue this practice for local tests. Thanks for the reminder, Dave. I know that many CW ops were hoping that the use of continuous beacons just below 136.0 would be stopping soon - especially with the return of CFH. To shift the QRSS/data modes back up to the top end of the band would be a significant help to those experimenters using receivers with only 'average' IF filters. Regards to all, Steve GW4ALG