From: "Mike Dennison" <mike.dennison@rsgb.org.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:10:25 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: LF: Higher L - higher ERP
Message-ID: <3A924291.19929.36D306@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Yesterday, I reported that I had increased my mast-head 
inductance so that the antennna was almost self-resonant. The new 
coil introduced resistive losses and the current reduced, but reports 
were better than before.

Last night, Jim, M0BMU measured my field strength compared to a 
measurement taken two weeks ago. It was 0.9dB up.

This does not account for the greatly improved reports, but it does 
show that with less current and more resistive losses, the only way 
the ERP could have increased is if the 'effective height' had 
increased. Field strength is of course directly proportional to current 
squared multiplied by effective height (h) squared.

At last here is real evidence that the elevated coil really does 
increase the 'h' part of the equation. Several of us were sure that it 
did, and several have noticed improvements in our signals when 
using elevated coils, but the evidence has always been anecdotal.

Before you all rush out to put coils at the tops of your masts, the 
improvement is really only significant if you have a small top section -
 mine is three parallel wires 0.5m apart and 18m long.

My ERP is now estimated at 165mW.

Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT)
http://www.lf.thersgb.net