Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9274 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2001 10:35:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 5 Feb 2001 10:35:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 16029 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2001 10:38:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 5 Feb 2001 10:38:00 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14PivM-0005IW-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2001 10:31:08 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from [213.2.16.106] (helo=rsgb.org.uk) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14PivE-0005IR-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2001 10:31:00 +0000 Received: from miked by rsgb.org.uk with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.8.7.5.R) for ; Mon, 05 Feb 2001 10:23:57 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:23:55 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: LF: Gs seen in W4 Message-ID: <3A7E7F3B.13589.357F29@localhost> X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Return-Path: miked@mail.rsgbhq Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Congratulations to Dex, Jim and Laurie for the first G-W on 136kHz. I have just looked at Dex's spectrograms and these are so clear that it looks like 10s dots would work fine. Using DFCW and 10s dots would reduce the transmission time sufficient to exchange a resonable amount of information before conditions worsen. It looks like Laurie is using a 2:1 dash:dot ratio. Is this correct? Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) http://www.lf.thersgb.net