Message-ID: <3A7C9468.37970A3@att.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 18:29:44 -0500
From: "Dexter McIntyre w4dex" <dmcintyre@att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Cc: lf@amrad.org
Subject: Re: LF: G3AQC copied in Virginia
References: <01C08DFD.3A87E240.esanders@erols.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Sandy,

That's great!  I was beginning to feel like there was some question
about
the authenticity of my reports.  Your report should remove any doubts. 
To do this with a 50 cm E field probe should encourage many others to
listen.

I was also surprised to find what I thought would be my noisiest antenna
to work the best.  I tried large multiturn tuned balanced loops, a large
shielded unbalanced loop, a tuned  200 foot per side square horizontal
loop and a beverage.  Then I find my 160 meter dipole fed as a T, right
above the house, close to many noise sources, receives 136 KHz the
best!  The only noise source I have noticed is from a light dimmer.  Now
that's noise!

73,
Dexter

 
Nan and Sandy Sanders wrote:
> 
>  From about 0030 GMT to about 0230 GMT and again from about 0330 GMT to
> about 0600 GMT I was able to copy G3AQC . I also copied dashes from M0BMU (
> who was a bit stronger in the first time period but only lasted about half
> the second period ). There was also a very faint broken line that could
> have been G3XTZ but was never strong enough to copy any letters. I used
> ARGO build 113 in 30s dot mode agc on.
>  I plan to download build 117 and give it a try tonight.
>  The most interesting thing I find about this reception is the receive
> antenna is a 50 cm long E field probe mounted 50 cm above the flat metal
> roof of a three story office building full of computers. It is able to hear
> much better than all but 1 or 2 of the home stations in this area.
>                                 Sandy
>                                 WB5MMB