Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> Received: (qmail 823 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2001 15:15:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 31 Jan 2001 15:15:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 12297 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2001 15:09:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 31 Jan 2001 15:09:33 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14Nyg8-0004re-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:56:12 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.50]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14Nyg6-0004rV-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:56:11 +0000 Received: from att.net ([12.77.24.229]) by mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.10 201-229-121-110) with ESMTP id <20010131145520.QVFT29713.mtiwmhc25.worldnet.att.net@att.net> for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:55:20 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3A78275B.132FE48A@att.net> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:55:23 -0500 From: "Dexter McIntyre w4dex" <dmcintyre@att.net> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re. 135 Last night References: <000801c08b8b$1c3dc8a0$5c7f883e@lvm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> Laurie, I would not have seen your signal if you were on or below 135.921. I was running Argo in 60 second dot mode and was only viewing from .921 to .924. I had selected this so I could see both your and Jim's frequency. On the Argo scale 1851 hz is 135.92105 and the 1854 hz mark is 135.92405. The 2 + minuet mark near center at the 1854 line is my reference marker on 135.924. It is about .5 hz low of the Argo line and is the reason for the .5 hz offset. http://dmcintyre.home.att.net/135923on30Jan01.jpg After reviewing all captured shots for the night I suspect your signal may be just below the frequency line at 1851 hz on Argo. This frequency line and the one at approximately 1853.6 are always present at night here so please try to avoid this frequency. Looking right at the bottom edge of the shot and on many other shots I can see what may be your signal. I'm sure sorry I missed it if that is so. Jim, M0BMU, has verified his signal at 135.924 KHz. His fast CW id can even be seen as a blur just before the first 110 second dash. I lost his signal shortly after this shot. Jim reported his insulators melted at 0130 UT. This shot was made at 0114 UT. I will be listening anytime your advise of your transmitting but looks like QRN is on the menu for tonight. 73, Dexter LAWRENCE MAYHEAD wrote: > > Hi Dexter and Larry, > Looks like Jim made it across last night,congratulations Dex and Jim. > I was on 135,919.9-,922 near as I can get but the 135,923 signal definately > Jims. With my low power I need better condx..We may have a CME tonight, > but I will be on again from 19:30. 73s Laurie.