Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>
Received: (qmail 7433 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2001 16:14:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227)  by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2001 16:14:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 11460 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2001 16:17:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70)  by warrior with SMTP; 13 Jan 2001 16:17:08 -0000
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14HTHO-0003xD-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 16:11:46 +0000
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Received: from d06lmsgate-3.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.3]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14HTHN-0003x8-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 16:11:45 +0000
Received: from d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.166.84.148]) by d06lmsgate-3.uk.ibm.com (1.0.0) with ESMTP id QAA132884 for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 16:02:33 GMT
Received: from usa.net (lig32-239-250-64.emea.lig-dial.ibm.com [32.239.250.64]) by d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.8.8m3/NCO v4.95) with ESMTP id QAA176240 for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 16:11:03 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID: <3A607DE7.A330B0CE@usa.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:10:16 +0100
From: "Alberto di Bene" <dibene@usa.net>
Organization: Undisclosed
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: [LF: VE1ZZ Friday]
References: <14083231.979382653886.JavaMail.imail@bronty>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

john sexton wrote:

> Hi Alberto,
> VE1ZZ was on 136.5, so you must have seen MM0ALM, and as Dave YXM has told
> me, MM0ALM was close to 136. It seems he was 40Hz higher than OK1FIG, which
> would put him on 135.995.
> 73, John, G4CNN
>

Thanks John,
              I uploaded a few screen shots of what I received last night
(basically OK1FIG,  MM0ALM  and  M0BMU) here :
http://www.qsl.net/i2phd/argo/ok1fig.html

73    Alberto    I2PHD