Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26441 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2001 18:00:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2001 18:00:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 6260 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2001 17:55:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 9 Jan 2001 17:55:03 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14G2sA-0004ew-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 17:47:50 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from jubilee.ns.sympatico.ca ([142.177.1.6]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14G2s8-0004er-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2001 17:47:48 +0000 Received: from ns.sympatico.ca ([142.177.213.192]) by jubilee.ns.sympatico.ca (Post.Office MTA v3.5.2 release 221 ID# 0-68925U141000L141000S0V35) with ESMTP id ca for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:47:31 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3A5BC206.5AE2A045@ns.sympatico.ca> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 17:59:36 -0800 From: "John Currie" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: ARGO Build 113. References: <3A5B37BB.11936.1878C3D@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Mike I am using ARGO and like it . I haven't found the squared display . how do you get it? john VE1ZJ Mike Dennison wrote: > This really is a nice piece of software. It is easy to run, is very > sensitive and continues to run when you are working on another > program in a foreground window. > > I really like the easy switch from entire band waterfall to narrow > band scrolling, but I find the frequency accuracy on the display is > not good. When changing from wide to narrow, the displayed > frequency (shown as the frequency of the strongest signal) can alter > by tens of Hertz, and when moving the scrolling display from the > bottom to the top of the band the frequency display becomes > inaccurate. Is this a function of the software, the clock on my > computer or my sound card? It isn't really a problem as I can > calibrate against 60kHz on the second VFO on the Rx, but it would > be nice if the display was consistent. > > I am using the 'squared' display which seems more sensitive for > very weak signals than normal. > > Well done and thanks. > > Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT) > http://www.lf.thersgb.net