Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25444 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2001 10:08:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 8 Jan 2001 10:08:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 22708 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2001 10:12:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 8 Jan 2001 10:12:05 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14FZ7x-0004fY-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2001 10:02:09 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.91]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14FZ7w-0004fT-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2001 10:02:08 +0000 Received: from alg.demon.co.uk ([194.222.171.80]) by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 14FZ7m-000Pxk-0X for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 8 Jan 2001 10:01:58 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3A599069.4FD81A83@alg.demon.co.uk> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 10:03:21 +0000 From: "Steve Rawlings" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: VE1ZZ tonight 2000.01.06 References: <19471315.978823249024.JavaMail.imail@chilly.excite.com> <000201c078b3$267736c0$d7bb7ad5@dave> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: John G4CNN wrote: > > Dave, MM0ALM, is clearly unaware that this frequency is in > > use and is in QSO with F6CNI within a herz or so. The thought > > occurs to me that we should make an effort to contact ALM > > before next weekend, so that he knows about the Transatlantic effort. Dave G3YMC wrote > This sort of problem is going to continue until we can get Jack to move his > crystal away from this part of the band and into the QRSS segments. You can > hardly blame Dave. I agree with Dave. There are several CW stations that operate around 136.5 kHz - and many of those stations do not monitor this Reflector, or are not equipped for QRSS. In an earlier Email, John Currie has written: > I think Jack may have a xtal for 136.0 kHz I wonder if this has been confirmed? Regards to all, Steve GW4ALG