Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6326 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2001 14:31:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 7 Jan 2001 14:31:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 10197 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2001 14:33:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 7 Jan 2001 14:33:58 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14FGhn-0008Qh-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2001 14:21:55 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from d06lmsgate-2.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.2]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14FGhm-0008Qc-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 07 Jan 2001 14:21:54 +0000 Received: from d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.166.84.148]) by d06lmsgate-2.uk.ibm.com (1.0.0) with ESMTP id OAA177258 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 14:07:02 GMT Received: from usa.net (ss5.bld.socks.ibm.com [9.14.4.70]) by d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.8.8m3/NCO v4.95) with ESMTP id OAA142332 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 14:21:06 GMT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3A587B33.E1D3A4BD@usa.net> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 15:20:35 +0100 From: "Alberto di Bene" Organization: Undisclosed X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: ARGO Build 113 References: <000201c07890$a4cd0fe0$8786883e@lvm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: LAWRENCE MAYHEAD wrote: > Good morning Alberto, > I have another small problem with build 113 recently downloaded.A signal > which produces a good display on build 110 seems to be far too strong for > 113.So I have to reduce the sensitivity greatly, or I have to switch OFF the > AGC. It seems as if this switch function is reversed! on build 113. What do > you think. 73s Laurie. Hello Laurie, thanks for the feedback. The fact is that the program is optimized for weak, very weak, signals, and the last mods to the AGC routine are a further step in that direction. So, with strong signals Argo is blinded, so to speak. The AGC function is not reversed. Probably you were in a condition of low noise and strong signal, and this new AGC compares the strength of the signal to the background noise level to compute the brightness to put on the screen. Build 110 used a different method. I will put in the next version a low sensitivity mode, for when the signals are strong. 73 Alberto I2PHD