Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3881 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2000 20:48:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 7 Dec 2000 20:48:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 2980 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2000 20:51:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 7 Dec 2000 20:51:03 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 1447mZ-0003rk-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2000 20:36:47 +0000 Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.91]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 1447mY-0003rf-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Dec 2000 20:36:47 +0000 Received: from alg.demon.co.uk ([194.222.171.80]) by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 1447mT-000CBL-0X for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 20:36:41 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3A2F4439.6553B511@alg.demon.co.uk> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 08:03:05 +0000 From: "Steve Rawlings" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: 136 kHz transmission tests References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Claudio! You wrote: > I'm planning to transmit some slow CW beacon from 7 to 10 > december. My working conditions: QRG 136.375 kHz, > Pout about 100W, 30 m wire antenna, > QTH locator is jn45pu 50 km north Milano. 136.375 kHz is not a very appropriate frequency for a beacon, as it falls within the portion of the band 136.0 to 137.4 kHz normally used for two-way conventional CW. I wonder whether you have an alternative frequency? Regards to all, Steve GW4ALG