Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp524190igc; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 01:54:15 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.106.134 with SMTP id gu6mr28773439wib.31.1388051655105; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 01:54:15 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cd19si11335722wib.7.2013.12.26.01.54.14 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 01:54:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vw7HO-0008HP-NT for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 09:30:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vw7HN-0008HG-PW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 09:30:57 +0000 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews05.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.8]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vw7HK-0005cn-6o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 09:30:56 +0000 Received: from cpsps-ews16.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.197]) by cpsmtpb-ews05.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Thu, 26 Dec 2013 10:30:52 +0100 Received: from CPSMTPM-TLF103.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.6]) by cpsps-ews16.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Thu, 26 Dec 2013 10:30:52 +0100 Received: from Extensa ([195.241.183.120]) by CPSMTPM-TLF103.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Thu, 26 Dec 2013 10:30:53 +0100 Message-ID: <39966C71EF4543899F81399598C190F7@Extensa> From: "PA1SDB, Peter" To: References: <2f507c1ff91346b2b8adba0518611224@kabelmail.de> In-Reply-To: <2f507c1ff91346b2b8adba0518611224@kabelmail.de> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 09:30:52 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18645 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Dec 2013 09:30:53.0063 (UTC) FILETIME=[2BE2E170:01CF021D] X-RcptDomain: blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: UWE, Very stable frequency here yesterday. 73's, Peter PA1SDB www.qsl.net/pa1sdb ----- Original Message ----- From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2013 3:16 PM Subject: Re: Re: VLF: 8969.99 [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.75.39.8 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 08189ecf0514bcba2be8490569e8d13c Subject: Re: Re: VLF: 8969.99 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_1A17_01CF021D.2B71F730" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3488 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_1A17_01CF021D.2B71F730 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit UWE, Very stable frequency here yesterday. 73's, Peter PA1SDB www.qsl.net/pa1sdb ----- Original Message ----- From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2013 3:16 PM Subject: Re: Re: VLF: 8969.99 Hi Markus, its true, this moment our cat is terrorizing his neighbor fellows. Snatches of sunshine here around. GL, Uwe/dj8wx ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Gesendet: 25.12.2013 14:57 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: Re: VLF: 8969.99 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cat alarm! Today noise and QRM is very low here, and now there's a clear trace on my grabber http://df6nm.darc.de/vlf/vlfgrabber.htm ... about 13 dB SNR in 0.47 mHz, and even faintly visible in "600" 3.8 mHz. Better than ever! May well show up on Eddie's grabber again http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23312120/vlfgrabber.html Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: Markus Vester Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 11:44 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99 Hi Jim, didn't see the cat myself, he was betrayed to me by others Lubos http://www.ok2bvg.cz/vlfgrabber/ Paul http://abelian.org/vlf/fbins.shtml#p=1387832400&b=080&s=sp Peter http://www.qsl.net/pa1sdb/ Stefan http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html Apparently Uwe's cat's carrier was on air today from 17 to 21 UT, but not this morning. Unfortunately my own grabber is too noisy to catch much of it, except for the odd bright pixel. 73 and good luck, Markus (DF6NM) From: hvanesce Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 11:18 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: VLF: 8969.99 Uwe and Markus, Was he out from about 02:15 to 03:15? I?m trying to interpret using Markus? grabber. Hope springs eternal here that with management of natural noise, continuous monitoring and luck I might detect TA signals. I was making receiver modifications for noise mitigation (i.e. receiver off) approximately 01:00 ? 10:00. If I had known that it wasn?t raining at 0200 I would postponed my receiver noise modifications. I am running multiple windows at different bandwidths (thanks everyone for your previous advice on this) to enhance the chance of detection with arbitrary on/off (rain/dry) periods. 73, Jim AA5BW From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 1:59 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99 Yes, Markus, but he is back agn. GL, Uwe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Gesendet: 23.12.2013 20:52 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: VLF: 8969.99 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hey Uwe, your cat's on walkabout again! 73, Markus ------=_NextPart_000_1A17_01CF021D.2B71F730 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
UWE, Very stable frequency here = yesterday.
73's, Peter PA1SDB
www.qsl.net/pa1sdb
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de =
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, = 2013 3:16=20 PM
Subject: Re: Re: VLF: = 8969.99

Hi Markus,
its true, this moment our cat is terrorizing=20 his neighbor fellows.

Snatches of sunshine here around.

GL, Uwe/dj8wx
Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Gesendet:=20 25.12.2013 14:57
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Betreff:=20 Re: VLF: 8969.99

Cat = alarm!
 
Today noise = and QRM=20 is very low here, and now there's a clear trace on my=20 grabber
http://df6nm.darc.de/vlf= /vlfgrabber.htm
... about 13 = dB=20 SNR in 0.47 mHz, and even faintly visible in "600" 3.8 mHz. = Better than=20 ever!
 
May well show = up on Eddie's grabber again
http= ://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23312120/vlfgrabber.html
 
Best = 73,
Markus=20 (DF6NM)
 

From: Markus Vester
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 11:44 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99

Hi = Jim,
 
didn't see = the cat=20 myself, he was betrayed to me by others
 
Lubos http://www.ok2bvg.cz/vlfgrabber= /
Paul http://abelian.org/vlf/fbins.shtml#p=3D1387832400&b=3D080&am= p;s=3Dsp
Peter http://www.qsl.net/pa1sdb/=
Stefan http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html=
 
Apparently Uwe's=20 cat's carrier was on air today from 17 to 21 UT, but not this morning. = Unfortunately my own grabber is too noisy to catch much of it, = except for=20 the odd bright pixel.
 
73 and good=20 luck,
Markus=20 (DF6NM)
 

From: hvanesce
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 11:18 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: RE: VLF: 8969.99

Uwe=20 and Markus,

Was=20 he out from about 02:15 to 03:15? I?m trying to interpret using = Markus?=20 grabber.

Hope=20 springs eternal here that with management of natural noise, continuous = monitoring and luck I might detect TA signals. I was making receiver=20 modifications for noise mitigation (i.e. receiver off) approximately = 01:00 ?=20 10:00. If I had known that it wasn?t raining at 0200 I would postponed = my=20 receiver noise modifications.

I=20 am running multiple windows at different bandwidths (thanks everyone = for your=20 previous advice on this) to enhance the chance of detection with = arbitrary=20 on/off (rain/dry) periods.

73,=20 Jim AA5BW

From:=20 owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]=20 On Behalf Of=20 uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de
Sent: Monday, = December=20 23, 2013 1:59 PM
To:=20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: VLF:=20 8969.99

Yes, = Markus, but he=20 is back agn.
GL, Uwe

Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Gesendet:=20 23.12.2013 20:52
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Betreff:=20 VLF: 8969.99

Hey Uwe, = your cat's=20 on walkabout again!  73, Markus

<= /HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_1A17_01CF021D.2B71F730--