Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15901 invoked from network); 15 May 2000 22:07:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 15 May 2000 22:07:20 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12rSvJ-0000rU-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 May 2000 23:01:13 +0100 Received: from mta3-rme.xtra.co.nz ([203.96.92.13]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12rSvI-0000pO-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 May 2000 23:01:12 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from [202.27.181.51] by mta3-rme.xtra.co.nz (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP id <20000515215950.RYMF10955419.mta3-rme@[202.27.181.51]> for ; Tue, 16 May 2000 09:59:50 +1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <392072FD.26AF@xtra.co.nz> Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 09:58:21 +1200 From: "vernall" X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-XTRA (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Minimal ringing narrow filter References: <001201bfbd78$d264a680$6d5c97d4@win95.swipnet.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: I have changed the subject heading to better identify the thread: C Andersson wrote: > > >Could you post a brief text summary of your design? > >73, Bob ZL2CA > > PA0LQ filter descriptions: > http://www.alg.demon.co.uk/radio/136/af_filter.htm > http://home5.swipnet.se/~w-54761/pa0lq_filter.htm > > 73 > Christer, sm6pxj Browsing this material gives some interesting results. The "secret" to minimising ringing is in the stagger tuning of the four stages of filtering. It is a hybrid sort of arrangement (so is not a classic Butterworth, Chebyshev, elliptic or Bessel ...). The design from Harry PA0LQ is for a centre frequency of 1000 Hz. For an overall bandwidth of 30 Hz, the individual stages are tuned for 966, 982, 1018 and 1034 Hz. The tuning resistors need to be accurately set, but are of the order of 180 ohms. GW4ALG made a variant of the PA0LQ design, centred on 800 Hz, and tuned it by trial and error looking for minimal ringing when fed with a stream of 800 Hz dits using a keyer used as a signal generator. The tuning resistors arrived at are 346, 385, 420 and 485 Hz. The overall bandwidth was not measured but a comment was made "the bandwidth would seem to be less than 45 Hz" and the filter easily passes 25 wpm. I do not have the basic design formulae for the filter stage used, but I assume there is a critical relationship between individual Q for and resulting bandwidth in a four stage stagger tuned arrangement. It is specifically the linear phase that is the desired result. GW4ALG confirms that with all stages netted to the same frequency, and was hopeless for ringing and "normal speed CW would not pass through the filter". Some CW ops use a tone as low as 400 Hz. While the stagger tuned filter appears to offer a lot in the way of minimised ringing compared to other designs, if the PA0LQ design is sought to perform at a somewhat lower centre frequency, then I believe the R and C values of each stage need to be scaled, as well as the low value "tuning resistors". For a given overall bandwidth, I would expect the stage Qs to each be lower as the centre frequency becomes lower. Then what stagger frequencies should be used to obtain the desired linear phase? Are there any filter design experts on the reflector that could come up with a general design, so that individuals could implement their own preferences for centre frequency and net bandwidth? As a further suggestion, a filter using four stages could have tuning resistors (and capacitors?) selected by one or more CD4066 chips (four electronic switches, has internal resistance, but is low enough to work with 180 ohms net resistance) so that pre-set variations on frequency and bandwidth could be selected as desired by DC control (no need for a multi-pole switch). Bob ZL2CA