Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by mtain-df05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 49F1E38000085;
Sat, 11 May 2013 03:20:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1Ub45e-0006Qj-94
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 08:19:34 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1Ub45d-0006Qa-Mu
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 08:19:33 +0100
Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>)
id 1Ub45c-0003oV-6h
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 11 May 2013 08:19:32 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjUOAEnwjVFcHn+e/2dsb2JhbABagweDc6wmkDUEAQMBexd0gh8BAQUIGxUeLgEEBQMDEQQBAQMCJgICORYIBhMICYd/rA2QfoEmjGUzcQYQgiwyYQOOYZoAgxA7
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,652,1363132800";
d="scan'208";a="409314072"
Received: from host-92-30-127-158.as13285.net (HELO malHP) ([92.30.127.158])
by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 11 May 2013 08:19:11 +0100
Message-ID: <391BEF2499784297A415C646217AB7D5@malHP>
From: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <06erv6qg9p410f7ddcncl4j1.1368254966134@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <06erv6qg9p410f7ddcncl4j1.1368254966134@email.android.com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 08:18:56 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Christian There has been no CW acty on 136 for a long time
that is why I packed it in. Some years back there was over 30 countries active
mostly on cw. DK7FC has a good signal on 136 but poor RX on CW. All 136 acty
for a long time has been Blind Beacons, and QSL via emails or Internet reporting.
73 es gl de mal/g3kev [...]
Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc
Subject: Re: LF: CW on 137
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="utf-8";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME
autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d9518df148034e
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none
Christian
There has been no CW acty on 136 for a long time that is why I packed it in.
Some years back there was over 30 countries active mostly on cw.
DK7FC has a good signal on 136 but poor RX on CW.
All 136 acty for a long time has been Blind Beacons, and QSL via emails or
Internet reporting.
73 es gl
de mal/g3kev
-----Original Message-----
From: C. Groeger
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 7:58 AM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: CW on 137
Hello lf!
Are there stns beside Stefan, active in CW on 137 ?
I have set up a new big antenna and I'm planning to do some tests next week.
No interest in qrss, just CW!
73, DF5QG
Christian Groeger