Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11486 invoked from network); 9 May 2000 19:39:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 9 May 2000 19:39:48 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12pFl7-00021S-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 May 2000 20:33:33 +0100 Received: from mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk ([194.200.20.13]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12pFl6-00021N-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 May 2000 20:33:32 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from [195.44.221.201] (helo=netscapeonline.co.uk) by mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12pFko-0003LW-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 May 2000 19:33:14 +0000 Message-ID: <3918541E.25E046C0@netscapeonline.co.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 18:08:30 +0000 From: "g3kev" Organization: Netscape Online member X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: 82.7kHz CW signal References: <3.0.1.16.20000509133726.2d978d9c@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Rik Strobbe wrote: > Some weeks ago someone (G3YXM ?) reported hearing CW arround 80kHz. Last > night (+/- 22UT) I could heard just the end of a CW message followed by a > carrier (gave listening to that after abt. 10 minutes). This morning (06 > UT) the was a RTTY (like) signal on the same frequency. > The signal (both last night and this morning) was very strong (S8 on my > meter with the antenna tuned to 136kHz). I reported the cw signal on 82.8 khz. Sometimes it transmitts rtty and some times idles on carrier. It could be useful for those that need to improve reading morse. > > > Is this the same signal ? > > 73, Rik ON7YD