X-GM-THRID: 1216796818753852508 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 12db77cd67df19b50bd322e40fa8019ea72ebe96 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.205.5 with SMTP id c5cs179807hug; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 15:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.216.6 with SMTP id o6mr7461727ugg; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p32si1713825ugc.2006.10.09.15.10.21; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 15:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1GX3Gm-0007vm-UL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:06:44 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1GX3Gl-0007va-UV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:06:43 +0100 Received: from imo-d03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.35]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GX3Gg-000789-Q6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:06:43 +0100 Received: from G4gvw@aol.com by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id l.390.fe9891 (29679) for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 18:02:35 -0400 (EDT) From: G4gvw@aol.com Message-ID: <390.fe9891.325c20fb@aol.com> Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 18:02:35 EDT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5017 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.043,HTML_40_50=0.086,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.178 Subject: Re: LF: Re: erp ierp - bluff Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1160431355" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4056 -------------------------------1160431355 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I may be about to demonstrate an "ignorance" here but it has always been my understanding that "field strength" also has to be defined as being that field potential that exists within a defined set of dimensions in "space". It seems to me that for all practical purposes (as opposed to purely theoretical) that we are into an area which is usually defined as being " relative". As practicing technicians/engineers/enthusiasts trying to achieve "results" I think it is more important that we have an understanding of the various parameters that both regulate and analyse our endeavours than to worry too much about definitions and pedantics. 73 de Pat G4GVW es gd dx Qth near Felixstowe, UK -------------------------------1160431355 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I may be about to demonstrate an "ignorance" here but it has always bee= n my=20 understanding that "field strength" also has to be defined as being that fie= ld=20 potential that exists within a defined set of dimensions in "space". It seem= s to=20 me that for all practical purposes (as opposed to purely theoretical) that w= e=20 are into an area which is usually defined as being " relative".
As practicing technicians/engineers/enthusiasts trying to achieve=20 "results" I think it is more important that we have an understanding of= the=20 various parameters that both regulate and analyse our endeavours than to wor= ry=20 too much about definitions and pedantics.=20
 
73 de Pat=20 G4GVW es gd dx
Qth near Felixstowe,=20 UK
 -------------------------------1160431355--