Return-Path: Received: (qmail 903 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2000 07:09:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 8 Apr 2000 07:09:32 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12dpIC-0003bR-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2000 08:04:28 +0100 Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.89]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12dpIB-0003bM-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2000 08:04:27 +0100 Received: from alg.demon.co.uk ([194.222.171.80]) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 12dpHy-000M0X-0V; Sat, 8 Apr 2000 08:04:14 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-ID: <38EED893.D621CF3F@alg.demon.co.uk> Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2000 07:58:27 +0100 From: "Steve Rawlings" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, "Steve Baugh" <100042.134@compuserve.com> Subject: LF: G/GW 73/136 Crossband QSOs References: <24546.200004071701@gemini> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Jim M0BMU wrote > . . . I hope to be QRV later this evening on 73kHz. I am also working > on my field strength measuring equipment, and hope to try it out > later in the weekend. I am delighted to report an LF crossband QSO this morning (Saturday) with Jim (Jim on 73, me on 136). Jim was easy copy at RST 559 in a 500 Hz bandwidth over the 170 km path. Well done, Jim! But my first LF crossband QSO - and presumably the first G/GW LF crossband - took place when I worked John G4GVC (140 km) last night. Noise levels were higher last night, but John's 73 kHz signal was still a good 559 here. Thanks for encouraging me to get the antenna tuned for 73 kHz, John! I experience very similar local electrical noise on 73 kHz to that heard on 136 kHz. So, unless I build another noise canceller for 73 kHz, my best chance of hearing stations on 73 kHz will be in the mornings. Regards to all, Steve GW4ALG Tel: 01291 625977 ************************************** Life Member ARRL; G-QRP Club No. 10574