Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6789 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2000 17:40:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by dimple.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 6 Apr 2000 17:40:50 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12dG6t-00072B-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 18:30:27 +0100 Received: from mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk ([194.200.20.13]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12dG6p-000726-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 18:30:23 +0100 Received: from as24-s16-146-19.cwci.net ([195.44.146.19] helo=netscapeonline.co.uk) by mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12dG6c-0000RC-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2000 17:30:10 +0000 Message-ID: <38EC42D2.1E7D78F@netscapeonline.co.uk> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 07:54:58 +0000 From: "g3kev" Organization: Netscape Online member X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Decca Masts References: <6f.3402e1e.261d1ae1@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: G0MRF@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 4/5/00 9:35:08 AM GMT Daylight Time, blanch@pncl.co.uk > writes: > > << This is exactly what the DMG is trying to avoid. > > If anyone wants to operate from these sites under his own licence > using his own kit and his own callsign then he can do so without > further ado using /P. >> > > Thank you Walter and Mike for the replies. > Yes, I realised that a letter to the RIS is all that is needed to remove need > for the /P suffix and for the ability to operate 73k away from the main > station address. > My interest, as you surmised, related to the 1 W ERP limit on both bands. > > I believe that a special event call can be obtained via the RSGB in about 4 > weeks, so on this occasion it's probably too late ( Hert's mast). > > I look forward to those 1 W ERP signals, and subsequently, to all those > calibrated selective level meters across Europe. In the meantime I'll try for > a 100W NOV and see where how far I get. With 100 W erp from a 300/400 ft mast the signal would be enormous. Good TX filtering is essential to avoid splattering and swamping everyone else on the band, especially those located up to a few hundred miles from the site. With only 2 khz b/width on 136 khz this could be a problem and could become another RUGBY scenario for every one else on the band. Using MOSFET switched mode type amplifiers could also be a problem, especially the 3rd/5th harmonics and beyond. A good linear valve amplifier would be a better choice. Taking the above observations into consideration good luck with the experiment and I hope you manage to work across the Atlantic. The weakness could be the other end. I have been trying to encourage some 160 metre dxers, with large antennas on the East coast USA to try 136 khz but they do not seem to be interested. There are also three GI amateurs that I know with towers in excess of 130 ft high, each one has at least two towers but they are not interested in anything below 160 metres. Those with the hardware, capability, experience and ideal locations do not seem enthusiastic. That leaves GI3PDN with his 80 ft tower and myself GI3KEV with a 120 ft tower. If anyone wants to organise a DXPEDITION to Cookstown/Tyrone sometime let me know. It is also a rare County for ALL band activity. Any band that I operate on from there attracts a PILE UP. G3KEV/SCARBOROUG > > > 73 > > David G0MRF. > > (Enjoying working into ON / PA / DL etc on a 10m vertical. Tough, but fun.)