Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25594 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2000 22:30:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by bells.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 3 Apr 2000 22:30:30 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12cFFz-0002ik-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 23:23:39 +0100 Received: from mta1-rme.xtra.co.nz ([203.96.92.1]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12cFFx-0002cN-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2000 23:23:37 +0100 Received: from [202.27.181.36] by mta1-rme.xtra.co.nz (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP id <20000403220323.HCIV17040128.mta1-rme@[202.27.181.36]> for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 10:03:23 +1200 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-ID: <38E90FC3.38DF@xtra.co.nz> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 09:40:19 +1200 From: "vernall" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-XTRA (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: re-inventing References: <38E8CAB4.47F7F568@netscapeonline.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: g3kev wrote: > > LF techniques covering every aspect have been documented over the years > and while some purport to be inventing new methods they are really > copying what has gone before. The broadcast industry has covered it in > great depth and the various Government Agencies have also perfected the > two way communications aspect especially narrow band methods. It seems > the majority interested in LF do not realise this and think they are a > first. Really? One of my interests in amateur radio is to have a bit of FUN using radio, including the LF bands. There are no firsts in the having of individual fun. Bob ZL2CA