Message-ID: <38A1BD13AFC54D08B573B87510889DBD@standard9dmup1>
From: "Walter Staubach" <wum.staubach@t-online.de>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <C2FC4802CC5340E08216E5D4304F85EC@White> <1528720709.20130114092604@tut.by> <op.wqv3d8rrv16t3f@xn----rfameuhquf> <9F8CB1AEE09F4B658239326D0F662F09@gmc.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:34:30 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: Re: Listened on 472 kHz
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="koi8-r";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Petr,
     the activity in CW could be better, no doubt. But there are also active 
evenings. For example yesterday around 19UTC:
 - G3KEV wkd DF8ND
 - DF8ND CQ, but no response on DJ2LF call, QSB
 - OK2BVG CQ, but no response on DJ2LF call, QSB
 - HB9ASB strong, wkg QSX 35xx
 - DJ2LF wkd G3KEV
WSPR can be interesting, but I prefer regular QSO's.
Indeed, after sunset and the night will be the best time for working.
And what about transmitting?
Maybe we all should do like this:
Some CQ-calls a day keep frustration away
(Hopefully) ;-)
73
Walter DJ2LF



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Petr Maly" <p.maly@gmc.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 9:28 AM
Subject: LF: Listened on 472 kHz


> Hello all,
>
> I can reasonably listen to LF/MF only in my /P QTH. After long long time I
> could spend almost the whole Saturday by listening on 472 kHz. The only
> station heard was DL2HRE, see the screenshot. I haven't heard any one 
> else,
> and no QSO. I believe the conditions would allow the standard two-way CW
> QSOs easily.
> Is the current traffic on 472 kHz really that low? Are you all on WSPR? Is
> the activity now splitted amongst 136, 472 and 505 kHz? Should I listen
> after sunset instead? Is the number of countries with 472 kHz permitted 
> for
> all still low?
>
> 73, Petr, OK1FIG
>
>
>
>