Message-ID: <3886075C.722287E4@netscapeonline.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:50:04 -0800
From: "g3kev" <g3kev@netscapeonline.co.uk>
Organization: Netscape Online member
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Comment - Transatlantic
References: <000501bf61c3$f89b2f60$393801d5@dave>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>


Dave Sergeant wrote:

> >From Dave G3YMC
>
> A few comments on recent mails.
>
> Although I agree that by and large the stations with high good antennas
> stand the best chance for transmitting across the atlantic, small antennas
> do offer some advantages for reception.  In particular, small antennas pick
> up far lower local QRN levels, which is particularly important on lf.
>
> It is worth noting that G3KEV apparantly does not hear my signals with the
> large antennas he uses - several far less well equiped stations at
> comparable distance copy me consistently.

Your neighbour G3XDV in his report dated Jan 16th, heard you at 329 so except
the wind happens to be in the right direction I probably will not hear you. Who
are the less well equipped stations at comparable distance that are hearing you
? I am the most Northern active in England until you get to MM0ALM near
Aberdeen.

>
>
> Of course for the transatlantic work low angle radiation is a must - a high
> vertical coupled with an excellent ground system does seem ideal for this.
> But that is not to preclude the better equipped stations with Marconis and
> similar, and there are several UK stations not on Mal's list who must have a
> sporting chance.
>
> As G3XDV says, the first thing to do is to establish if DCF39 can be copied
> in the USA - I suspect if it is not received there as strongly as we hear
> CFH the chances are slim.
>
> 73s Dave G3YMC
> dsergeant@iee.org
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/sergeantd