Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26730 invoked from network); 15 Dec 1999 20:35:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by 212.159.2.35 with SMTP; 15 Dec 1999 20:35:06 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11yLW8-0007DX-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 20:59:24 +0000 Received: from mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk ([194.200.20.13]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11yLW7-0007DS-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 20:59:23 +0000 Received: from userag10.netscapeonline.co.uk ([62.125.130.97] helo=netscapeonline.co.uk) by mailhost.netscapeonline.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11yL0v-00029A-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 20:27:10 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-ID: <3857F7CB.25765D6C@netscapeonline.co.uk> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 20:19:24 +0000 From: "malcolmg3kev" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Organization: Netscape Online member X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en-gb]C-CCK-MCD NetscapeOnline.co.uk (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: re-inventing the wheel References: <1999121515051368199@zetnet.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Peter. But there is still nothing to beat an old signal generator and an audio amplifier and a piece of wet string. (Your illustration in the lf book). Why change for the sake of it. It takes a lot skill to handle the drift. 73 Mal/G3KEV Peter Dodd wrote: > > The Broadcaster fraternity and Admirality engineers pioneered, and have been > > using the Low frequencies for 50 years very successfuly. We Radio Amateurs in > > 1999 are merely re-inventing the WHEEL and have a long way to go to catch up > > with the commercial achievements. > > I have been privileged to edit the LF Experimenter's Source Book and > the LF Chapter for the RSGB Communication handbook. The overwhelming > impression that I have is the sheer innovation of the equipment > designs that have emerged, from transmitter drivers to the class-D > PA's, which most of us are using these days. Methods of weak signal > detection, using readily available equipment and software is another > example of this innovation. The display of equipment at the last > couple of HF Conventions has been a source of inspiration to many of us. > > > It is back to basic theory and interesting as > > long as one understands its limitations for the average radio amateur with a > > small back garden and very poor antenna, and limited ERP. > > The amateur has succeeded in long distance because they ignored the > limitations described above. This is similar to the QRP club ethos, > where good operating can often make up for QTH limitations - the > final component in a communications system is the bit between the earphones. > > -- > Regards, Peter, G3LDO > >