Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21426 invoked from network); 15 Nov 1999 22:07:45 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 15 Nov 1999 22:07:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 21684 invoked from network); 15 Nov 1999 22:06:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 15 Nov 1999 22:06:13 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11nU75-0002hc-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 21:56:39 +0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from disp.mindef.nl ([62.200.204.66] helo=u05.mindef.nl) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11nU74-0002hW-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 21:56:38 +0000 Received: from co.disp.mindef.nl (dial-085.pop3.mld.disp.net [62.200.208.85]) by u05.mindef.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id AAA2616 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 1999 22:55:58 +0100 Message-ID: <383080D3.4F932B98@co.disp.mindef.nl> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 22:53:23 +0100 From: "J.M. Valstar" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [nl]C-CCK-MCD QXW07201 (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: nl,de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re : Ropex Mods References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello Group, May be I can give some suggestions/hints. Hope you will succeed, gd luck ! And pse let us all know your experiences. 73 Jaap/pa3guc Mike Dennison wrote: > > I would be glad to supply detailed instructions on the process to anyone > > contemplating the re-crystallization (?) of a Ropex. > > 73 > > Andre' N4ICK > > ************************ > Andre, > > I will be getting a Ropex Tx as a Christmas present for my portable > work. Please let me have details of the crystal mods. I modified the prototype of the Ropex (in fact the real First, hi). Nico/pa2njn operates it . It was very easy to make that modification. I can't give details of the mods in particular, cause the PCB of the produced Ropex differs from the prototype. I can imagine, you have to make minor modification(s) to the pcb. Just order an X-tal ; f.e. for SCW 48 x 137.7 = 6609.6 kHz (The used x-tal is a standard cheap x-tal (6.5536 MHz) other freqs have to be ordered, I think. You will have to check how to place/connect the 2nd X-tal and thumble switch on the print and front panel, I cannot give suggestions for that.. It might be possible to make a third frequency just by switching the x-tals parallel to each other ! I don't have experience with that, so it has to be checked out. > I have a synthesizer for 136kHz. Can this be used to drive the > Ropex? Are there snags, like it blows up if there's no drive? No, for the Ropex oscillator runs on 273 kHz ( the 4060 acts as a 24-divider). Don't even try to let it run on 136 or 273 directly; Two defective Fets are a great risk! The best way is like I did, also Albert/PA0AWN worked this way. I made Vfo mod. for Nico's set. I placed a BNC connector in the front panel. Next to this connector I placed the thumble switch to select either the original X-tal, or the VFO-input. Nico's Vfo's freq is around the x-tal freq and only replaces the X-tal. Because a lack of space around the oscillator circuit of Nico's set I made this mod very simple. I believe to have used pin nr 11 of the IC (a 4060) for the VFO output (50 Ohm ). I will check this for sure (Nico has to open his set for that). The VFO output is 100 mW, but can be less I suppose. Nico is working a few weeks already with this modification. When there is no Osc. drive a RC oscillator of the Fet-driver IC will take over oscillation to prevent the FETs from breaking down. The output freq was abt 73 kHz(?!), but I don't think this is wise to use, because the output trafo has been designed for 136 kHz and this freq. is not stable ! > Ideally, I would like to run two crystals, preferably with VXO > capability (one for normal CW, one for QRSs) but also have a > socket for the synth. > 73 > Mike, G3XDV