Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10929 invoked from network); 24 Aug 1999 15:53:01 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 24 Aug 1999 15:53:01 +0100 Received: (qmail 8784 invoked from network); 24 Aug 1999 14:51:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 24 Aug 1999 14:51:26 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11JHi8-0004Sr-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 15:38:04 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from smtp-out2.bellatlantic.net ([199.45.39.157]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11JHi5-0004Sl-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 15:38:01 +0100 Received: from bellatlantic.net (client-151-200-120-32.bellatlantic.net [151.200.120.32]) by smtp-out2.bellatlantic.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA16917; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 10:42:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <37C2AE82.20DCA90F@bellatlantic.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 10:38:58 -0400 From: "Andre' Kesteloot" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.02 [en]C-DIAL (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Multiple tuned vertical References: <000601beeba0$859e6e80$ed29f482@win95.swipnet.se> <3.0.1.16.19990824093942.2dcf930a@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Rik Strobbe wrote: > If it is not asked too much I would be interested in a copy of the Multiple > Tuning Antenna too. in the mail today :-) > Regarding the meander-antenna : if you scale all the described antennas to > 136kHz you still get 'monster-antennas'. But the fact that they manage to > increase the radiation resistance by a factor up to 20 (compared to an > simple vertical of the same height) is impressive. I would be more than > happy to get my radiation resistance up to some 100 milliohm instead of the > actual 45 millohm. 20 x would be almost 0.1 ohm, would it not? It seems to me that, somewhat like drafts looking for the fountain of eternal youth, all of us are always searching for the perfect small LF antenna :-) (the price Faust paid was a little to steep for me...) See you in October at Winsor? 73 Andre' N4ICK