Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2589 invoked from network); 8 Aug 1999 13:02:28 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 8 Aug 1999 13:02:28 +0100 Received: (qmail 11353 invoked from network); 8 Aug 1999 11:59:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 8 Aug 1999 11:59:10 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11DRP8-0001ul-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Aug 1999 12:46:18 +0100 Received: from mail1-gui.server.ntli.net ([194.168.222.13]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11DRP7-0001ug-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 08 Aug 1999 12:46:17 +0100 Received: from cableol.co.uk ([194.168.18.53]) by mail1-gui.server.ntli.net (Post.Office MTA v3.1 release PO203a ID# 0-33929U70000L2S50) with ESMTP id AAA28133 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 12:33:27 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <37AD69F8.B71F0E1@cableol.co.uk> Date: Sun, 08 Aug 1999 12:28:56 +0100 From: "Steve Rawlings" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "LF Group" Subject: LF: 136 kHz bandplan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: Hi All, Over the past 3 weeks I've heard a lot of slow-CW (QRSS) activity on 137.1 kHz - a popular frequency for normal CW operation. Yesterday morning (Saturday), I worked Geri DK8KW; Fred DJ5DI; and Gerd DJ5BV on that same frequency. Today, however, a weak QRSS signal is again on 137.1 kHz - making it difficult to copy DX signals running conventional CW in the range 137.0 - 137.2 kHz. I was under the impression that there was enough space for narrow-band (QRSS) operation above 137.4 kHz. Or is this no longer the case? Regards to all, Steve GW4ALG