Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11101 invoked from network); 17 Jul 1999 02:27:45 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 17 Jul 1999 02:27:45 +0100 Received: (qmail 19945 invoked from network); 17 Jul 1999 01:29:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 17 Jul 1999 01:29:34 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 115J8N-0003kv-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 02:19:23 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from smtp-out2.bellatlantic.net ([199.45.39.157]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 115J8M-0003kq-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 02:19:22 +0100 Received: from bellatlantic.net (client-151-200-125-200.bellatlantic.net [151.200.125.200]) by smtp-out2.bellatlantic.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA24603; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 21:22:59 -0400 (EDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <378FD9A6.7C85326D@bellatlantic.net> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 21:17:26 -0400 From: "Andre' Kesteloot" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.02 [en]C-DIAL (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vernall@xtra.co.nz, "rsgb_lf_group" Subject: Re: LF: Horizontal polarisation on LF? References: <378FA25C.4435@xtra.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: vernall wrote: > [...] > If sky wave mode is what > is actually being sought after, then it may well be worth experimenting > with a horizontal "dipole"? assuming the above hypothesis is valid, why not a horizontal loop, which could be much smaller than a dipole ?Andre' N4ICK