Message-ID: <37655BC8.78B9856@cableol.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 20:45:13 +0100
From: "Steve Rawlings" <steve.rawlings@cableol.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "LF Group" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: LF: Frequency separation: Normal CW operation
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Over the past month, I had become aware that a certain G-station - new
to LF, but with a very commanding signal on 136.53 kHz - was often heard
to 'clobber' QSOs, and CQ calls from other stations.  This puzzled me
greatly, because I knew that the station concerned could usually hear
the other stations involved.

It appeared to me - and to others - as if the station was deliberately
causing QRM to his fellow LFers.

Having recently telephoned the operator concerned, I can report that the
reason for the unintentional QRM amounted to a lack of understanding
concerning typical IF bandwidths employed by amateurs on 136 kHz.  The
operator concerned is using a receiver with an effective IF bandwidth of
50 Hz (!), and he was quite happy to operate to within 100Hz of other
stations!

I advised the operator that we tend to assume a receive IF bandwidth of
250 Hz and generally aim to maintain a 300 Hz separation from other
stations.  (I believe that 300 Hz has been the figure quoted during LF
Group discussions and at the LF Forum.)  I hope I did the right thing.

But with the fancy new receivers now available (which I'll probably
never be able to afford!), does the Group still feel 300 Hz to be a
reasonable separation for normal CW operation?

Regards to all,
Steve GW4ALG