Return-Path: Received: from rly-mb01.mail.aol.com (rly-mb01.mail.aol.com [172.20.118.137]) by air-mb02.mail.aol.com (v119.11) with ESMTP id MAILINMB24-c4470153df1c7; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:09:38 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-mb01.mail.aol.com (v119.11) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMB16-c4470153df1c7; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:09:05 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1IcRZL-0005I0-F5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:08:43 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1IcRZK-0005Hr-NO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:08:42 +0100 Received: from web28115.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.182.135]) by relay3.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IcRZI-00081a-7I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:08:42 +0100 Received: (qmail 79170 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Oct 2007 20:08:32 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=L81Iq5axgN7eZqfm66nT4g/Wi/yd8RshSjo/2mHfi0SPmmF7+VmhGO88mfNttZhjQUsUU2gw2SwGeYTEl5omaz/eD0KFIMsljBzUOV6YFGF23uKt2X/wS6Y65Q9aT32oiSXOlAtj+fojQW6Dv4ymG4zCXDI1UIRk1EvO1Titc/o=; X-YMail-OSG: 82r6kMAVM1kQ2DUSn9Rs7UZp5HoS8AN9KkdkEh_N6OH.8lvi_K0VsxIgGFBGF.oZilihZFeYaQCqVXpONnf7MVJ4Y5ZsoudMLyg5ItlPLVUGS4WR84fQ Received: from [81.152.103.251] by web28115.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:08:32 BST Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 21:08:32 +0100 (BST) From: Peter March To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <00bb01c80462$f7383060$a0756a58@wgt01> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <375761.73454.qm@web28115.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> DomainKey-Status: good (testing) Subject: Re: LF: [500] RTTY Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1764418212-1191269312=:73454" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,LINES_OF_YELLING, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --0-1764418212-1191269312=:73454 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi all OK I can not tell a lie we were testing 45.45 baud 170Hz shift on 503. 20:30 onwards not my transmission however but I was involved. You know my views about 501 has now become a beacon band which really renders it unusable for any thing other than beacons. Especially if there is a local station that insists on being on nonstop 24 hours a day. Luckily its not too bad here but the request for the best type of RX for 501 the other day, I resisted saying the best RX for this band is an Intel Pentium4 PC with a good internet e-mail connection!!!!....... :-) "TEST TEST TEST DE G3XIZ G3XIZ G3XIZ QTH BIGGLESWADE BIGGLESWADE BEDS BEDS LOC IO92UB IO92UB PWR 65 MW 65 MW ERP INTERNET C.CJO AT BTINTERNET.COM DE G3XIZ G3XIZ G3XIZ ARKCYQ " And if you liswten now you will hear Chris he's on now.... Pete FMT vy 73 Gary - G4WGT wrote: Hi LF, I keep getting very short bursts of the phantom RTTY signal at 503.000khz ???? ****************************** 1+J ACT M0FMT M&2!.5 $3 1 (/8+ &3XIZSRFVVM7 ****************************** I received this line amongst lots of garbage & there is a call sign we all know in there - M0FMT ??? 73 Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Sergeant" To: Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 12:58 PM Subject: Re: LF: [500] RTTY > On 1 Oct 2007 at 12:45, Graham wrote: > >> Its not Me ! > > Then I guess we need to blame somebody else.... > > It appeared right on top of John GM4SLV last night when I got the rig > tuned up to answer his CQ call. Guess the culprit didn't check the > frequency first (tongue in cheek...). > > By the way John I gave you one short call which you obviously didn't > hear. But then you went down in QSB around 2030z and I went QRT. > > 73 Dave G3YMC > > http://www.davesergeant.com > > > --------------------------------- Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Tryit now. --0-1764418212-1191269312=:73454 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi all
 
OK I can not tell a lie we were testing 45.45 baud 170Hz shift on 503.   20:30 onwards not my transmission however but I was involved.
You know my views about 501 has now become a beacon band which really renders it unusable for any thing other than beacons. Especially if there is a local station that insists on being on nonstop 24 hours a day. Luckily its not too bad here but the request for the best type of RX for 501 the other day, I resisted saying the best RX for this band is an Intel Pentium4 PC with a good internet e-mail connection!!!!.......   :-)
 
"TEST TEST TEST DE G3XIZ G3XIZ G3XIZ QTH BIGGLESWADE BIGGLESWADE BEDS BEDS LOC IO92UB IO92UB PWR 65 MW 65 MW ERP INTERNET C.CJO AT BTINTERNET.COM DE G3XIZ G3XIZ G3XIZ ARKCYQ "
 
And if you liswten now you will hear Chris he's on now....
 
Pete FMT vy 73

Gary - G4WGT <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Hi LF,

I keep getting very short bursts of the phantom RTTY signal at 503.000khz
????

******************************
1+J ACT M0FMT M&2!.5 $3 1 (/8+ &3XIZSRFVVM7
******************************

I received this line amongst lots of garbage & there is a call sign we all
know in there - M0FMT ???

73

Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp



----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Sergeant"
To:
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: LF: [500] RTTY


> On 1 Oct 2007 at 12:45, Graham wrote:
>
>> Its not Me !
>
> Then I guess we need to blame somebody else....
>
> It appeared right on top of John GM4SLV last night when I got the rig
> tuned up to answer his CQ call. Guess the culprit didn't check the
> frequency first (tongue in cheek...).
>
> By the way John I gave you one short call which you obviously didn't
> hear. But then you went down in QSB around 2030z and I went QRT.
>
> 73 Dave G3YMC
>
> http://www.davesergeant.com
>
>
>



Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Try it now. --0-1764418212-1191269312=:73454--