Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1453 invoked from network); 1 Apr 1999 19:17:46 +0100 Received: from magnet.plus.net.uk (HELO magnet.force9.net) (195.166.128.26) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 1 Apr 1999 19:17:46 +0100 Received: (qmail 25135 invoked from network); 1 Apr 1999 18:18:06 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (194.75.130.70) by magnet.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 1 Apr 1999 18:18:06 -0000 Received: from troy.blacksheep.org ([194.75.183.50] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10Slw2-0000Xd-01; Thu, 1 Apr 1999 19:11:23 +0100 Received: (from root@localhost) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id UAA04200 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing; Thu, 1 Apr 1999 20:02:59 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (root@post.unica.co.uk [194.75.183.70]) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA04196 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 1999 20:02:57 GMT Received: from bw85zhb.bluewin.ch ([195.186.1.75]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10SluP-0000U7-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 1 Apr 1999 19:09:41 +0100 Received: from phonakcom.ch ([195.186.13.123]) by bw85zhb.bluewin.ch ( with ESMTP id AAA21EC for ; Thu, 1 Apr 1999 20:09:33 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3703A879.97EAE676@phonakcom.ch> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 19:10:17 +0200 From: "Toni Bdrtschi" Organization: Phonak Communications AG X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [de] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: AF-filters and CW versus SlowCW References: <37033EDB.63B6BC32@phonakcom.ch> <37036390.D7B84D15@nephro.uni-kiel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >From HB9ASB, JN36pt Here some additional remarks concerning the tests: - The term "blind" means that the Test-TX was sending automatically and I did not know its text in advance. - When testing with longer dot periods (10s) I changed the dwell time and the averaging control to higher values in order to find an optimal setting. May be the result will be different under heavy QRN or QRM (Lux-effect) conditions and show an advantage for longer dot-periods. And it is also possible that I could get other results with other type of receivers. 73 de Toni