Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> Received: (qmail 6641 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2001 22:42:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 20 Feb 2001 22:42:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 16799 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2001 22:42:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 20 Feb 2001 22:42:13 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14VLLs-00006q-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:33:44 +0000 Received: from imo-r15.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.69]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14VLLq-00006l-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:33:42 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from DL4YHF@aol.com by imo-r15.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.5.) id l.37.10fc5a30 (3857) for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:32:44 -0500 (EST) From: DL4YHF@aol.com Message-ID: <37.10fc5a30.27c44a8b@aol.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:32:43 EST Subject: LF: Re: Recent postings, splitting the reflector To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0.i for Windows 95 sub 69 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com> Concerning Andre's and (YMC-) Dave's proposal to split the reflector: That's exactly what I have been thinking about (but never dared to suggest :-). It has been stated a few weeks ago what the original intention of the reflector was, and IMHO things seem to drift away from that. Splitting up the reflector (by setting up a new reflector for the 'hi-tech' stuff and letting this reflector for what it was intended to be) would be good for both sides of the 'LF activity spectrum'. It would certainly speed up the development of new modes, because one wouldn't have to think about "how far can i go into detail in this mail without boring 99% of the readers'. Anyway, if the creation of a second reflector is possible or not, thanks to the guys at blacksheep for hosting THIS reflector. Wolf (DL4YHF, DF0WD).