Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1102; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL,
	FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.1.3
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id u6DIcRRV002527
	for <sq5bpf@lipkowski.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:38:27 +0200
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1bNOvt-0002jh-69
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:30:53 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1bNOvs-0002jY-HQ
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:30:52 +0100
Received: from rgout0303.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.209])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.87)
	(envelope-from <c.ashby435@btinternet.com>)
	id 1bNOvq-0002Cu-Dh
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:30:51 +0100
X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.155.68.20 (GB)
X-OWM-Env-Sender: c.ashby435@btinternet.com
X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=28/50,refid=2.7.2:2016.7.13.171817:17:28.394,ip=86.155.68.20,rules=__HAS_MSGID,
 __SANE_MSGID, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM,
 __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, FROM_NAME_ONE_WORD, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME,
 __REFERENCES, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT,
 __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE,
 __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE,
 __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __URI_WITH_PATH,
 __URI_NO_WWW, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __URI_IN_BODY,
 __FORWARDED_MSG, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_500_599,
 __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, __URI_NS,
 SXL_IP_DYNAMIC[20.68.155.86.fur], HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10,
 BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, __OUTLOOK_MUA,
 __SINGLE_URI_TEXT, SINGLE_URI_IN_BODY, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1,
 BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,
 REFERENCES, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS, NO_URI_HTTPS, MSG_THREAD, LEGITIMATE_NEGATE
Received: from IBM7FFA209F07C (86.155.68.20) by rgout03.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.122.06) (authenticated as c.ashby435@btinternet.com)
        id 578633B2000C43CB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:30:47 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1468434650; 
        bh=KtgRhzFZ16IrCxxpsJwSjwTPZMcR13wvvCTKYHIY3Qs=;
        h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer;
        b=lyPUuimntu47+p+TMWCepAtX2pX0wqiZWKUS/4AZCjPCFML/0nZvlg2sTC476Zs1qnfbYm6TLk3JeQ0yw1FIe5sLvZSf88rCHoG/cWUD37qpWXWDqc7nE4q4JnDUXUb37qJVnIUTf9//RJAdsnGCd8nwhnWQloLWJ0qa5S0WbhE=
Message-ID: <36495CD82FE74C48B2EAC34BF1309157@IBM7FFA209F07C>
From: "Chris" <c.ashby435@btinternet.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <178286273.1256395.1468404155372.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <178286273.1256395.1468404155372.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <57868071.6010801@df3lp.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:30:47 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="UTF-8";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.11
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 8370

Probably because it's so easy and we've done it many times before?
G4AYT.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter" <pws@df3lp.de>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics


> Hi,
> 
> On 13.07.2016 12:02, M0FMT wrote:
>>...
>> Why is there such a high number of DLs receiving SAQ at 116 ?
> 
> Why is there such a low number of *reports* from UK receiving SAQ ?
> 
> Peter
> 
> PS: http://lf-radio.de/misc/SAQ/SAQ_1998.wav
>