Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 546D8380000EF; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:10:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UFrxK-0008G4-EO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:07:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UFrxJ-0008Fv-Mu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:07:21 +0000 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UFrxH-0006TD-P7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:07:20 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.16.8]) by mwinf5d13 with ME id B86v1l00R0ASFpN0386wpG; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:06:59 +0100 Message-ID: <35E00701E5084182B6C94811C2ECBED9@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <178E9695AC6241D2BFFE19A43FABF566@AGB> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:06:55 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: OK Laurence That makes sense , flag left over from the 506 test 73-G. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b4085bc26841e34d79a2f3beb8f287b1 Subject: Re: LF: VE7BDQ de SWL-KL1X (Alaska): Op32 1334 mi -37 dB in 506 testing only with 0.1w + L Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0038_01CE2026.4FB54950" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED, HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad05140f9597f8b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0038_01CE2026.4FB54950 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable OK Laurence=20 That makes sense , flag left over from the 506 test=20 73-G. From: Laurence KL1 X=20 Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 7:50 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: RE: LF: VE7BDQ de SWL-KL1X (Alaska): Op32 1334 mi -37 dB in 506 = testing only with 0.1w + L think its John on 136 - I dont think I left 506 running... I certainly = left Op32 running on 136.... =20 Laurence KL 1 X/VE5 =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- From: g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:15:08 +0000 Subject: LF: VE7BDQ de SWL-KL1X (Alaska): Op32 1334 mi -37 dB in 506 = testing only with 0.1w + L VE7BDQ de SWL-KL1X (Alaska): Op32 1334 mi -37 dB in 506 testing only = with 0.1w + L At -37 DB that must be OP32 , but 136 or 506 ? G.. =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0038_01CE2026.4FB54950 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
OK Laurence
 
That makes sense , flag  left over from the = 506 test=20
 
73-G.

From: Laurence KL1 X
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 7:50 PM
Subject: RE: LF: VE7BDQ de SWL-KL1X (Alaska): Op32 1334 mi = -37 dB in=20 506 testing only with 0.1w + L

think its John on  136 - I dont think I left = 506=20 running... I certainly left Op32 running on = 136....
 
Laurence KL 1=20 X/VE5
 
From: g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk
To= : rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Date:=20 Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:15:08 +0000
Subject: LF: VE7BDQ de SWL-KL1X = (Alaska):=20 Op32 1334 mi -37 dB in 506 testing only with 0.1w + L

VE7BDQ de SWL-KL1X (Alaska): Op32 1334 = mi -37 dB in=20 506 testing only with 0.1w + L
At  -37 = DB =20 that  must be  OP32 , but  136 or  506 =20 ?
G..
 
------=_NextPart_000_0038_01CE2026.4FB54950--