Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w7NCjFZI011417 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 14:45:17 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fsovI-00068q-39 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:41:12 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fsovH-00068h-QG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:41:11 +0100 Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fsovG-0004Y3-9l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:41:10 +0100 Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id u12-v6so3248750wrr.4 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 05:41:10 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y8m0TR5qBMcYvo52g0EBmGej4J7rwksHRI06cahYMPk=; b=IQ78rn4LkCoPja2fmkqTSR+rqHhmcQW5vGAzlKkEI8HUcRt/qTc0t4+tff7WOfp8VS so0pkDqq18NLQYjLXJJSXdJccIIYzjcYMYKsUHS40HViTDNEB23y9eog6Kqw6bmVUl6a mIxU6aRJmdurTYK6RlTL+GMuN1x6LYsjnNeC3xWro6/r04RA1gpdOISeeVINpJkEFJPJ IQ2KNYWIn2ZC2d1BDUJ1y17CGSSNpPc/ImcbvoeF9+qJqZ4+6HodkeWwHBk/thFsC6O9 tpw14G2IK5wpB7h4Zg/YcqbBb5TYt6Z6blTRZdpxJKUcak1u1HM4XCERWYJuxwxcWlfe E8yw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y8m0TR5qBMcYvo52g0EBmGej4J7rwksHRI06cahYMPk=; b=QtaGmaM/77WnJvQAnvSoE/mAIvWcxx7jn55G+ADmS0z6sUpmlumax7NLUUPkp29iwc D4KFyBWzlprhJxVcmsaFgNcVWcMSZsIenlk1O96Vp1pjh192G9/Mh46yBJPWM4tr3x3J Jn+DDfZ8R2qZV8SjtAuAoBUPX1EvvHzKL0TnOgiYaLk/S85rtHqlFjkOrAtfBlUfSMRO av8NX60DfxsnSByihTxNUp5TXqdG5APWL9a3PHXlNCrpgAEMNUFouPKKI+CiMKyWE8Hv 9NMEkfLfYn2F0jWV8EOYTS7CRQafJ8PD1U8awSx3qwp9uwP2ImFBkZsBF2zMKLcoWXxQ OlZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AsMYPi7lJ+95JcAPSe0zWCjxhKj+WyrLPqoQprSfkk4GHGZxYt /WXi/ehcB0kIldBxJIVf3K/be9o7 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdb+Nd0UZeAgpo7ZoLnuuTWDYe78pJ0ohWz8lyTSRR2xyHbLrJsmoaIBKsuDu4jkL1ECFKwxZw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:9d1c:: with SMTP id k28-v6mr7553533wre.104.1535028069554; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 05:41:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n14-v6sm4088619wmc.14.2018.08.23.05.41.07 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 05:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:41:06 +0100 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <35252456.20180823134106@gmail.com> To: Andy Talbot In-Reply-To: References: <1613303827.20180823120801@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello Andy, Thanks for checking, glad we concur! I am an expert at frigging about, sounds OK to me, I'll post my results in due course, all the best! Thursday, August 23, 2018, 1:31:12 PM, you wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:42d listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 086f3faad0220c9ae57a7913e711a86d Subject: Re: LF: Anyone good with Elsie? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by klubnl.pl id w7NCjFZI011417 Hello Andy, Thanks for checking, glad we concur! I am an expert at frigging about, sounds OK to me, I'll post my results in due course, all the best! Thursday, August 23, 2018, 1:31:12 PM, you wrote: > The caps are likely to be close to their proper value ], which > leaves the values of the inductors. > You have E12 preferred values so guess you're using ready made L components. > They may be specified at a different frequency, a different > mounting etc. all of which affect their value.   If you can't adjust > the inductance, frig the caps, as Stefan suggested. > I checked the design using ADDE - got the same frequency response plot  > Andy > www.g4jnt.com -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com