Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CB8273800009C; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:46:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RbiOq-0006aZ-KJ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 00:45:16 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RbiOq-0006aQ-4P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 00:45:16 +0000 Received: from nm3.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([212.82.108.234]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RbiOp-0006YJ-Mo for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 00:45:16 +0000 Received: from [212.82.108.229] by nm3.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Dec 2011 00:45:09 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.225] by tm2.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Dec 2011 00:45:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1002.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Dec 2011 00:45:09 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 513030.71114.bm@omp1002.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 38650 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2011 00:45:09 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=jHDSlNfhrM/Y3XGVKjriFFK1D+3dnC/aeHmZEJsYe6t2ZN9lD/ZwKBAQM+eu7F/smZv7Us5Uxj4ewYh8SpfaNUpG1Btq19zj/hyshIEWXAILmR4Si0bEfFfTj0Q01l5lRneIxOlM66bnRu8xNteWW7jpmItXcronGWU7hxay5Cw= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1324082709; bh=0JJaGTwCM36Z5DvJN+c8t/y4P1NO6TGOEhW2C/27/lw=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=tzDYrQV3AP0cvR3yKcb67D10X3Hc5PqM0th+K8zV3Ua2EV4hZVqFcc7HNauQnN6xZ4KC3O/tiCmlfAXX/eNE3M+TQKapepmUGv86Oi0RD5R/rOqBE3NdlH+DqebOE8KQj8is5nmbgq5qhNd9zdUKgWDdsu1wQUZp3v4yFRgQv5A= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: WKGPmCsVM1nGlXj714HkfjJv5Fx8PYNfZ86rrS2V2CWF9pU dV48.J39UWL1akw2OMPjt6kTPOTzz8RadiYbxKEUB.Mok.RMfdaniWpYsA_t M.bckftRpYkOVYlc.Bve2xjpIcHvdbSpnFxkJ_VwZPoZnkdncWrfI3iIKVNN _G9.KbOVX0RZvpVKS.aGLxBg5UPPDBrqfogOoJ1FclxmLstLfIxBXTRPDALq OyX5rtVVejDbf5f7CcCAaAG1PVkeHy1PuUKrYFD5Wk2VmF44IvgA9dnZdCzM XfnNNrh_AmFbESyVgRD430zHaktx5h6pWLZxANyqFAvv3tP4mESw59Hz9G.Z qqEa7iJX2yZeVqH53tbznArBdZEDda4XR1jL_Jlgwkf7_fdlfjWMyP7ushbS 0gwDU0OOLmH59bf_k1Q-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Cxhli3eswBD1ozmtAojhjrja86kWx0Qm9tycD5QR1DKWrOLgjJcXkw-- Received: from JimPC (james.moritz@86.183.181.71 with login) by smtp829.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2011 16:45:09 -0800 PST Message-ID: <323C824311F2470F88D6EA386A1262FF@JimPC> From: "James Moritz" To: References: <002101ccbbf1$5b23d850$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <003d01ccbbf3$0aae64b0$200b2e10$@com> <002f01ccbbf5$e35a9d90$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <003e01ccbbfc$df523080$9df69180$@com> <006401ccbc02$e19c11c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <004a01ccbc0b$a6c2fb00$f448f100$@com> In-Reply-To: <004a01ccbc0b$a6c2fb00$f448f100$@com> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 00:45:22 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: Litz Wire Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:448793440:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m206.2 ; domain : btopenworld.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40864eebe65d659d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear Terry, LF Group, Re: is litz wire useful? It depends on the individual antenna. Consider 3 examples: 1) Very large antenna in an open field environment (e.g. G3KEV). The antenna might have capacitance of 1nF or more, requiring only a few hundred uH of inductance for resonance, with a reactance of a few hundred ohms. The antenna resistance is probably several ohms. In order to keep the proportion of TX power dissipated in the coil to a reasonably small fraction of the total, the coil resistance must be below a few ohms. This will be achieved if the coil Q is < 100 or so. This is not a demanding requirement and does not require special coil construction. 2) Small antenna in a back garden. Antenna capacitance is a few hundred pF, requiring several mH of inductance, with reactance of several kilohms. Antenna loss resistance is also high due to proximity to trees and buildings, probably 50ohms or more. So provided the coil resistance is below a few 10s of ohms, the coil will not greatly reduce overall efficiency, which will be achieved with a coil Q of a few hundred. This is fairly easy to acheve with the much larger coil neccessary than in case 1, without requiring special coil construction.. For instance, a coil of 1mm enamelled wire 150mm diameter should have a Q of well over 200. However, in order to achieve anywhere near 1W ERP with the very low antenna efficiency, High TX power of the order of 1kW or more will be needed. Using litz wire can reduce the resistance of the coil by something like a factor of 3, which will certainly help stop the coil overheating, even if it has little effect on overall antenna efficiency. The high reactance also means high voltage (>10kV not unusual), which requires a physically large coil to avoid breakdown. 3) Small antenna in an open field site. Now the coil reactance must be kilohms similar to the back-garden antenna, but the loss resistance of the antenna can be much lower; in my experience, less than 10 ohms. So you now require a large coil with a very high Q, of the order of 1000, so that the coil does not seriously reduce overall antenna efficiency. Litz wire is practically essential to achieve this, although even if a relatively low-Q coil does compromise the antenna losses, antenna efficiency will still be better than the back-garden antenna overall. Again, the voltage will be high, so a large coil will be required anyway. > I have just seen an eBay ad for LITZ WIRE 10/44 250 ft at 15 > USD including shipping to the UK (the seller has more than 10 available). > Is > this size any good for winding loading coils? I guess this means 10 strands of 44AWG wire, which would be rather small for winding a coil that has to support a few amps of RF current. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU