Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id w5SFVXSF011355 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 17:31:35 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1fYYgc-00005I-6H for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:18:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1fYYgb-000059-EG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:18:17 +0100 Received: from mail-wr0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22f]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91_59-0488984) (envelope-from ) id 1fYYgZ-00010H-4d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:18:16 +0100 Received: by mail-wr0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id h10-v6so5906759wrq.8 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:18:14 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uvHDIShU8SR6SWU3dVROy87vJ7WMeVEC1k91vnYoNUs=; b=CTaIaSCpN6FeZsq1kx4UN66cuLYH4/cz94rc/J7Nasn/TFiPcnBKAXL3Ea7KM5AzzG 0pXceBiMrmikN8TT+XhqnJ83+woIQOoszMqrVCmoNnGLfmrgK+sTYQpzy2RM0PY96qRU 9SeO+hSXXSMfixowCYPmUtA5G03urwWPzexNV6iwYl4md5vItwGzOq3psw9lS6K7M/II KR1Hb6JKQX13z9rSeurN8/8n0EvLpwND0GBLv+qoyHLJcwxg0mslI1z5JDGdzMC/zRjT PfxkroMYph6ji2cPwHT2mXfPEleRn7yorWMBC8MN+OjOkx4WgV4pe2TDUZM/jYaG+/Ak ERzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uvHDIShU8SR6SWU3dVROy87vJ7WMeVEC1k91vnYoNUs=; b=GOA/LnhMc5WlDMBRp3Xx0gK9If80KqxE4Ig8RMgwLNkqIE7iLOHyw9JV/KFtd2a1/N HPHPgDcuX8hH+Lg3btphIxWg3Ls4ywte3MLKM27C/TGYgGo4q6BWqvj4S2RVA2jNxe8W Qwjsb06ZHbpUOnwR+hBTec1jNrNKpW97rYEn4/sdjCHc0vQWP2ZeOgB2yYMx5cmoPRcF 1LKaIopC+1n81Gu7P3GdhYJGCAPep2RajiIpdWQj8+wE24QxzCVJJpG5yfG9Gu56qhUC eZXXHRxl/sNIuIEuZHIVEpf7BYdLjFDB83KxJjWhCsNVddaaW/oztToTq/PEotNiFJQX P2NQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E14QzQS/6OJABgfDXmSnh7CLmJw+g6oCqG6T+dOPOFeD54p2wS4 bnkZdrql6TR5GNhpKJNw4PvuBA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpc2OPyRIwo6v65v0WF/AZVrcGms0sgIO+xxyiEbv/UTwIlW7ZEk5/Smn0LJbYb0ghWJ7phZKw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:b2f4:: with SMTP id g107-v6mr9493761wrd.53.1530199094018; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o17-v6sm7051727wrp.62.2018.06.28.08.18.12 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:18:11 +0100 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <319563372.20180628161811@gmail.com> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Hello LF'ers and MF'ers Can I, for RX only, use my single loading coil to match 2 receivers to my single (LF at the moment) antenna , one on MF and one on LF? I envisage 2 feedlines to the shack. How important is a 50 Ohm match on the MF one? If I need a second matching transformer for MF what toroidal core should I use? Thanks. 2E0ILY [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:400c:c0c:0:0:0:22f listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 59677119386dcf9f1872cb454dc1331d Subject: LF: Can I match 2 frequencies with one loading coil? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello LF'ers and MF'ers Can I, for RX only, use my single loading coil to match 2 receivers to my single (LF at the moment) antenna , one on MF and one on LF? I envisage 2 feedlines to the shack. How important is a 50 Ohm match on the MF one? If I need a second matching transformer for MF what toroidal core should I use? Thanks. 2E0ILY -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com