Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp423284igb; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 05:28:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.178.166 with SMTP id cz6mr2072065wjc.53.1382617722667; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 05:28:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p2si648112wia.20.2013.10.24.05.28.42 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 05:28:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail header.i=@yahoo.co.jp Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VZJW6-0001Xj-9W for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:55:54 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VZJW5-0001Xa-RJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:55:53 +0100 Received: from web100011.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp ([114.111.98.185]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VZJW2-0001HI-Jq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:55:52 +0100 Received: (qmail 7995 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Oct 2013 11:55:40 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.jp Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.jp; s=yj20110701; t=1382615740; bh=8pJhVkuH3QC/doilbnISwKV+NxRMtQvTIwKhB9vVGlU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AED2ti9jYr2ldJDBP5aGg21LEUcLfu/w3a54z3lSUhklmCJA+tav3boU07HSNxNpWqol5zexz5HSEwTM3oOxVBFsCX7ccmnmTPvWQTnPy4SvW+uWyXiS8vQq9amNI3OY5I05IbeQQiC68LR4qhZibZ5RJ0AZumKuRtW+Lluwyps= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=yj20110701; d=yahoo.co.jp; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jR5uAk4QECbQ2Bo/pVx5dYSjvpjY+iVVjm9pgEZsvKrsv1lUywCWHL7Srg7MNOtnIV+kAB2PR54ObDSvrR7ikdu6f3LrTN5Ruq1HfYgIxtxmULmw62kE9Ubv5Sm542dt0XesU9cR7toJA9WCT2rXAK6VM9y3jmNRvJAC59PhieI=; Message-ID: <307765.6593.qm@web100011.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> X-YMail-OSG: VE3eaeEVM1l.FuMM.pCz857.Ud_eQB8fNxTRQp2qUS0B42XFrBjw6zJ0Mw07BMv7ZdnaZcQwJ15ZhWa2HiXIWVq7T0LQPkKAHxGko0Lwl31rgC5ByJMmPXo1pLP3DUG0IsRNYKNToQGOSApvLo2EVilbNbpeqlosMiD0sZr9YkToDMfAM.n8_boPGPACmI6y_sQpNZu_dZS7EKqTJkd.Wel96nK6pFpr7GnFTU1TgTxj1HOCJ44mM.lyE9iV4FBERmJLF8zm7xoblQnb9qrio4gUcPexqe7BNBEi2WzyM3hPTadkd9uZEB4S5BikpvHUyHzR5dB7fjNKaG2Cn.IpptCCvUJd7NsmJmVC.JgWEKCSSM7q4dIgISgTZTJOzLCCVMX7eHk6jvkZRm0zSg0K_VJL1At0rFhfXsOvPAjaEYePUdLJwqw40RtjciB.80V_au6sg3DClyewvGOCoaIIRE9Z Received: from [119.175.238.169] by web100011.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp via HTTP; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:55:40 JST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.111_49 References: <52690694.4050002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:55:40 +0900 (JST) From: Knight Ao To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <52690694.4050002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, JA7NI is using 2FSK instead of 4FSK WSPR. JH1GVY has devised a method that can utilize a DFCW tx to transmit quasi WSPR2. The 2FSK WSPR seems to be 3-5dB weaker, especially when there is QRN/QRM. Even so, KL7L and UA0SNV/UA0AET might have a chance of receiving, but I don't think he is receiving WSPR for the time being. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [114.111.98.185 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (ja10xx[at]yahoo.co.jp) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: ac0f6ff1af52b6036ac1f4fe0c2bd52c Subject: Re: LF: JA7NI in WSPR-15 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-115382655-1382615740=:6593" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2377 --0-115382655-1382615740=:6593 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan, =0A=0A=0AJA7NI is using 2FSK instead of 4FSK WSPR.=A0 JH1GVY has= devised a method that can utilize a DFCW tx to transmit quasi WSPR2.=A0 Th= e 2FSK WSPR seems to be 3-5dB weaker, especially when there is QRN/QRM.=A0 = Even so, KL7L and UA0SNV/UA0AET might have a chance of receiving, but I don= 't think he is receiving WSPR for the time being.=A0 =0A=0A=0AYas - Tokyo= =0A=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0A>From: Stefan Sch=E4fer =0A>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org =0A>Cc:= Vasily Savchenko =0A>Date: 2013/10/24, Thu 20:37=0A>Subj= ect: LF: JA7NI in WSPR-15=0A> =0A>LF,=0A>=0A>This morning i saw JA7NI on th= e WSPR database/map. As far as i know he was only QRV in QRSS/DFCW/CW durin= g all the years. Maybe the very high number of active WSPR stns in JA convi= nced him to try this mode.=0A>So far there were just "local" decodes, not s= ure if it was a QRP test. But it could be interesting for UA0SNV, KL7L and = DU1GM? Maybe even interesting for me, if he is receiving :-)=0A>=0A>73, Ste= fan/DK7FC=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A> --0-115382655-1382615740=:6593 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Stefan,
JA7NI is using 2FSK instead of 4FSK WSPR.&n= bsp; JH1GVY has devised a method that can utilize a DFCW tx to transmit qua= si WSPR2.  The 2FSK WSPR seems to be 3-5dB weaker, especially when the= re is QRN/QRM.  Even so, KL7L and UA0SNV/UA0AET might have a chance of= receiving, but I don't think he is receiving WSPR for the time being. = ;

Yas - Tokyo

--= --- Original Message -----
From: Stefan Sch=E4fer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelbe= rg.de>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Cc: Vasily Savchenko <ua0snv@yahoo.com><= br> Date: 2= 013/10/24, Thu 20:37
Subject: LF: JA7NI in WSPR-15
 =

LF,

This morning i saw JA7NI on the WSPR da= tabase/map. As far as i know he was only QRV in QRSS/DFCW/CW during all the= years. Maybe the very high number of active WSPR stns in JA convinced him = to try this mode.
So far there were just "local" decodes, not sure if it= was a QRP test. But it could be interesting for UA0SNV, KL7L and DU1GM? Ma= ybe even interesting for me, if he is receiving :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC


--0-115382655-1382615740=:6593--