Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18983 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2000 16:27:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 5 Mar 2000 16:27:32 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12Rdiq-0006be-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2000 16:17:36 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from mail.sci.fi ([195.74.0.41] helo=pyyhe.saunalahti.fi ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12Rdio-0006bZ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2000 16:17:35 +0000 Received: from default (MDXLI.hdyn.saunalahti.fi [195.197.41.41]) by pyyhe.saunalahti.fi (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id SAA02619; Sun, 5 Mar 2000 18:28:34 +0200 (EET) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20000305181732.00889100@pop.saunalahti.fi> X-Sender: oh2lx@pop.saunalahti.fi (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 18:17:32 +0200 To: "Mike Dennison" From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=E4in=F6_Lehtoranta?= Subject: Re: LF: CFH plots Cc: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-reply-to: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Mike, Thanks for interesting pictures of CFH signal variation. You can certainly receive it much better than I can here. It is most probably due to my qth on higher latitudes. On 2nd March I weakly heard CFH after 2230z with around -131 dBmW input on ESH2 (abt -4 dB(uV/m). On 4th March I didn't hear it at all (below -135 dBmW). Approximate estim. field strength with my present system: Fs (dB(uV/m) = listed dBmW + (107 dB) + (20 dB) , so during quiet condx can "see" down to -8 dB(uV/m) F-s. That quiet condx I sometimes have during winter... This is in agreement with my experiences during past 20 years on the nearby, now closed Measuring station. With an active calibrated HFH2-Z2 loop the threshold was around -5 dB(uV/m), with a 200 Hz IF B-w that is. You have any estimate how your dB's compare with F-s? Please, more pictures like that... 73 de Vaino, OH2LX At 10:45 5.3.2000 +0000, you wrote: >I have posted two graphs of CFH on my website at: >http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/mike/cfh.htm (at the time f writing this >it is not linked from any other page). >One was from last Thursday after the X flare, and may show the immediate >effect of an M flare on propagation. >The other was last night. >They are quite different, and it is interesting to note the differences >and similarities. For instance, on Thursday it rose to a peak of about >S9+10dB at 0230 (just after the M flare) and the fell gradually to dawn, >but last night it peaked S9 at 2300 and very slowly fell from there. >Similarities are dips at about 0400 and a dip and peak at about 0630 (UK >dawn). >I will post more graphs to improve our understanding of what's normal so >that enhanced propagation and its causes can be identified. > >Thanks are due to ON5OO for writing the monitoring software. Does anyone >have a good copy of the original EXE file? The one I posted on my site >is corrupt and I deleted all other copies - doh! >Mike, G3XDV >IO91VT >http://www.dennison.demon.co.uk/activity.htm ---------------------------------------------------------- V.K.Lehtoranta, OH2LX, POBox 50, FIN-05401 Jokela, Finland ------ Tel: +358-9-4173965 ---- Fax: +358-9-4173961 ------ E-mail: vaiski@dlc.fi - alias: oh2lx@dlc.fi & oh2lx@sral.fi