Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20011206172257.0095d3a0@pop3.esoterica.pt>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 17:22:57 +0000
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
From: "Brian Rogerson" <brian@esoterica.pt>
Subject: Re: LF: Conditions last night
In-reply-to: <000d01c17e62$97088fa0$09dc9384@ma.ultranet.com>
References: <003601c17c07$4c58fc40$587e883e@g3aqc> <3.0.1.16.20011204101542.2bff5384@pb623250.kuleuven.be> <002f01c17db2$4c388df0$0400000a@parissn2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

73.6 has been visible here for the last few nights and has been
fairly strong  and consistent between 03:00 and 06:00utc.  Please
see my plot for last night, the night before was similar.

73, Brian

At 09:30 06/12/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Observations by W4DEX and myself indicate that conditions were excellent at
>73 and 180 kHz during the early UTC hours of 6 Dec. We both were hearing HBG
>very clearly, and I copied Dex's 177.777 beacon at 0130, unusual for my
>location, which is noisy in the evening hours.
>
>This might be a good time to resume the 73 kHz tests, assuming that
>conditions continue. I have left my receiver on at home, with the screen
>capture running.
>
>On another note, I am fairly certain that CFH operates intermittently on
>73.6 kHz. I have heard the signal twice, and it is extremely loud here in
>Massachusetts. Operation seems to be in the late UTC hours. Last evening,
>there was a dead carrier just below there, 73.575 (I think - Dex can correct
>me), around 0200. Again, it was strong in North Carolina, and very hot in
>Massachusetts.
>
>John Andrews, W1TAG
>
>
>
>
>
73 Brian     CT1DRP     IN51QD     41 09 58N  08 39 11W
http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian