Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20011101110420.00926bc0@pop3.esoterica.pt>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 11:04:20 +0000
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
From: "Brian Rogerson" <brian@esoterica.pt>
Subject: Re: LF: Test Sigs
In-reply-to: <3BE1132B.25805.C2261@localhost>
References: <5.0.2.1.2.20011031141446.009f8e10@mail.pncl.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Hi Mike,

I have asked about the signal on 136.000KHz a couple of times now.  I think
it was
Ko who said originally it consisted of three signals a fact I confirmed for
myself soon after.
One of the signals could easily be said to be bad morse.  At other times
there are a multitude
of signals in the same bandwidth which just switch on alltogether and
similarly disappear.
I have just put an Argogram on my web site under Field Strength Calibration
since this is
the signal I have used to do the calibration.   

If anyone who has good reception of this signal could swing their loop on
it I would be
very grateful.  At this location it is some 25 degrees North of DCF39.

73, Brian  

At 09:17 01/11/2001 -0000, you wrote:
>>  Anybody know what weak carrier on 136 000
>> exactly is? It's received same strength both here and at MB7LF 11 miles
away so
>> not a local. Walter G3JKV.
>
>The only thing previously recorded on 136.000kHz appears at first hearing to 
>be sending Morse, but the 'dots' and 'dashes' are seemingly random. Several 
>people have reported spending time trying to decode the 'Morse' before 
>realising it was not intelligible. 
>
>
>Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT)
>http://www.lf.thersgb.net

73 Brian     CT1DRP     IN51QD     41 09 58N  08 39 11W
http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian