Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20010718083854.010833e0@pop3>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 08:38:54 +0100
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
From: "Simon Lloyd-Hughes" <simon.lloyd-hughes@rd.bbc.co.uk>
Subject: Re: LF: ZL-VE ERP?
In-reply-to: <3B54679F.25427.19404B8@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Have you looked in the ARRL news sheet.  There was some info in there but I
suspect not enough.

At 16:28 17/07/01 +0100, you wrote:
>Is there any more information about the successful ZL-VE tests? I would like 
>to run a story on the RSGB's GB2RS news service which has a wide 
>coverage, thanks to the Internet, but I have not yet seen any answer to my 
>earlier question about antenna and RF levels (preferably ERP).
>
>It is vital to have this sort of detail to make a useful comparison with
what may 
>be possible at 136kHz. For instance, 0.2W ERP at 185kHz might bear 
>comparison with 1W ERP at 136kHz, but 2W ERP at 185k would be quite 
>different - an achievement, nevertheless. I am surprised that I haven't seen 
>this info anywhere (perhaps I missed it). Some additional info was promised, 
>but I haven't seen that either.
>
>This could be a good news story and I am in an excellent position to spread 
>the word, but it is currently incomplete. Can anyone supply the missing 
>ingredient?
>
>
>
>Mike, G3XDV (IO91VT)
>http://www.lf.thersgb.net
>
>
>