Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21270 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2001 10:31:21 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Oct 2001 10:31:21 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 16582 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2001 10:31:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 1 Oct 2001 10:31:07 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15o0HE-0001Jc-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2001 11:26:20 +0100 Received: from public1.thorcom.com ([212.172.148.10] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15o0HD-0001JT-01 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2001 11:26:19 +0100 Received: from mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.6]) by public1.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 15nzp9-0003Rp-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2001 10:57:19 +0100 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id LAA43974 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 11:52:17 +0200 Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.20011001105044.2d67661a@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 10:50:44 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: Re: LF: Re: 73KHz beacon In-reply-to: <3BB82A2E.63FAEA93@usa.net> References: <3.0.1.16.20011001084908.2af76e6c@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello Alberto and group, A short vertical monopole has a gain of 4.77dBi / 2.62dBd because of its radiation pattern, especially the rather 'sharp' vertical pattern. This gain of 4.77dBi assumes a perfect ground, so no losses at all. I believe that there is a lot of confusion between the terms gain (or directivity) and efficiency : Gain (directivity) is what a certain antenna 'wins' because of the directivity in the radiation pattern. The reference antenna is a so-called isotropic radiator, a non existing antenna that will equally radiate in all directions. Any 'real world' antenna will have a certain directivity and thus a gain over this isotropic radiator (so you cannot have a negative gain in dBi). Efficiency is another thing, it is the ratio between the power you put into an antenna system and the power that is radiated. Assume you have a short vertical with a radiation resistance of 0.05 Ohm and the antenna system has a loss of 50 Ohm then the efficiency is 0.1% or -30dB. Any real world antenna will have an efficiency of less than 100% (or less than 0dB). Yet another thing is the effective radiated power, this is the product of gain, efficiency and the power you put into the antenna system. So if you put 200W (= 23dBW) in an antenna with a gain of 4.77dBi and an efficiency of -30dB the EIRP will be -2.23dBW (600mW), the ERP will be -4.38dBW (365mW). This is the theoretical (calculated) ERP, as mentioned in previous mails the real ERP will be most likely 3-6dB lower. For small antennas in an urban or forrested environement the difference might be even more. In for the above expamle one could expect a real ERP of 180mW in the best case, 50mW or less in the worst case. 73, Rik ON7YD At 10:32 1/10/01 +0200, you wrote: >Rik Strobbe wrote: > >> [...] >> The gain of a short vertical is 4.77dBi or 2.62dBd. >> [...] > >Hi Rik and the group, > maybe today I am denser than the usual, but, how can a short vertical >monopole have a gain when compared to a dipole (I suppose here a lambda/2 dipole) ? >I would have intuitively thought that a short vertical monopole has a loss >wrt to a full size dipole. Please enlighten me, thanks. > >73 Alberto I2PHD > > > >