Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20132 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2001 13:10:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Jun 2001 13:10:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 8778 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2001 13:09:09 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 27 Jun 2001 13:09:09 -0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15FEyo-0003Ah-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:03:38 +0100 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.6]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15FEyk-0003Ac-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:03:35 +0100 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id PAA1376286 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:02:52 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.20010627140305.21a7b326@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:03:05 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: LF: LF link page In-reply-to: <3B39A2E4.5BBEDD4E@usa.net> References: <005d01c0fe76$e6a457e0$ad2c1bd4@rci> <3B397DCB.F87B6FD3@alg.demon.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: On most 136kHz websites there is a more or less extended link page. Anyone who has his own website will have experienced that a link page needs a lot of maintainance (changing URL's, new websites come, other go), so it occurs to me that there is a lot of avoidable work done. What about the idea that one of us puts a 'complete' link page on his website and the others just put a link to that page ? All changes of URL, new sites etc.. would be needed to be done only once. If the others would keep an eye on it (report broken links and new sites) the amount of work for the 'sitekeeper' would be acceptable. What say ? 73, Rik ON7YD