Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>
Received: (qmail 2449 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2001 13:55:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227)  by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2001 13:55:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 4097 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2001 13:54:47 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70)  by warrior with SMTP; 11 Jun 2001 13:54:47 -0000
X-Priority: 3
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 159S4v-0001PE-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:50:01 +0100
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Received: from mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.6]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 159S4t-0001Os-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:49:59 +0100
Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id PAA1119856 for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:49:20 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.20010611144951.2c370646@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be>
X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16)
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:49:51
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
From: "Rik Strobbe" <rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.ac.be>
Subject: Re: LF: [TECH] Help needed on toroid trasf. construction
In-reply-to: <3B24ACC6.80671DF0@usa.net>
References: <00c501c0ef45$d61a3ec0$5774ccd4@194.95.193.10.fen.baynet.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Hello Alberto,

If you have access to Amidon cores I would try a ferrite toroidal core with
the #72 or #77 material. For wideband applications these materials are
rated for 0.5 -30 MHz. From my experience the frequencies given by Amidon
are 0.5dB or at worst 1dB points, so for -3dB the range might be something
like 0.2 - 70MHz
Below 200kHz loss will increase, but at these frequencies the noise level
is so high that you won't notice the few dB extra.
Besides the material it is the number of windings that determine how
'wideband' a transformer is, more windings will improve the LF behavior (at
cost of extra loss at the HF end) and vice versa. Experiment with the
number of windings.
A final tip : use a rather large toriod. It will allow you to space the
windings and thus reducing the inter-winding capacitance (that often limits
the upper frequency).

73, Rik  ON7YD

At 13:34 11/06/01 +0200, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>  I need some words of wisdom and a bit of help about the
>construction of a small toroid transformer.
>
>First the antefact : I swapped recently my TS-850 for a TS-950SDX,
>a very fine radio, but much less sensitive on the LF band than the TS-850.
>Looking at the schematics, and doing some filter simulation with
>Electronic Workbench, I think to have found the culprit, i.e. L3, a small
>toroidal transfomer, with ratio 1:4, which is inserted in the signal path,
>after the input attenuator, and before the filters bank. With all
probability,
>its  response at 136kHz leaves much to be desired. The TS-850 doesn't
>have any such transformer, the signal goes straight to the filters.
>
>So I have decided to replace it. Looking in the MiniCircuits catalog, I have
>found what seems to be the ideal replacement, the T4-6T-KK81 model, which
>has a -3dB response from 10kHz to 100MHz. Problem is that this transformer
>is not carried in stock by the Italian distributor, and both they and the
>MiniCircuits sales office have a minimum quantity amount for an order.
>
>At this point the only choice is to build it myself. And this is were your
help could
>come in my rescue. I need to know what your experiences are in building
>such a wideband kind of transformers. What is the best type of material,
>caveats to not forget, optimal number of turns, you name it.
>
>TNX for any help,
>
>73  Alberto  I2PHD
>
>
>
>