Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4342 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2001 09:20:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 19 Jan 2001 09:20:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 22349 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2001 09:14:43 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 19 Jan 2001 09:14:43 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14JXW2-0007Z4-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:07:26 +0000 Received: from mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.6]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14JXW1-0007Yz-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:07:25 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id KAA54776 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:07:12 +0100 Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.20010119105824.2c077f56@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:58:24 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: Re: LF: Loading Coils In-reply-to: <200101181624_MC2-C22B-D97E@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello Roger, I hadn't thought of the loading coil that way (never too old to learn ...). It sounds interesting to me as my loading coil consists of 3 parts : - a 2.5mH coil at the top of the vertical part - a big (7mH) coil that can be tapped, at the moment I am using only 0.5mH of if (so a lot of 'useless copper' arround - a smaller coil that can be adjusted between 0.8 and 1.3mH by sliding a ferrite rod (now without the rod in in, so 0.8mH) In an attempt to be smart I placed the small coil horizontal (to avoid that the ferrite rod would 'slip away' by gravity) and the big coil vertical (to minize coupling between the 2 coils). Both coils are on a plastic box abt. 0.4m from the ground and abt. 0.3m separated. I wonder if I would gain anything if I placed both coils vertical ? Also it is attempting to try the plate under the coils, for a first try I could cover the plastic box with alu-foil (household) or is this a too thin metal layer ? If I find some time over the weekend I will try to do some tests. 73, Rik ON7YD >The loading coil is not just a matching device, it is also a primary source >of vector potential and it is the vector potential, rather than its >offspring, the magnetic and electric fields, which is the fundamental >source of electromagnetic radiation. It is therefore advantageous to place >the coil upright at the base of the antenna. Furthermore, as a large >component of the vector potential is locally concentrated in this region, >it may be possible to gain a few dBs by placing an aluminium or copper >plate, somewhat larger than the diameter of the solenoid, a few centimetres >under the solenoid, insulated from the earth but it may be connected >directly to the TX ground terminal.