Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23213 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2000 08:34:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by grants.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 10 Apr 2000 08:34:37 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12eYTB-0000fe-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:18:49 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.6]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12eYTA-0000fZ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:18:48 +0100 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id JAA105126 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:18:35 +0200 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.20000410091501.2e77d172@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 09:15:01 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: Re: LF: Good conditions coming? In-reply-to: <2000040723353368199@zetnet.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Auroral conditions must have been expectional on Thursday night (April 6th) as we had VISUAL aurora borealis (arround 22UT) in central Belgium. But I noticed no propagation enhancement on LF. 73, Rik ON7YD At 23:35 7/04/00 +0100, G3LDO wrote: >Mike said > >> A 'severe solar wind shock' impacted Earth at 1632UTC yesterday. >> This resulted in a big aurora, The A Index is 56. This is higher than >> early February when VA3LK was getting good signals from DCF. > >> It will be interesting to see if this causes some good LF conditions. >> If it does, it probably shows that the Solar Flare warnings are >> useless as this aurora was preceded by 2 C-class and 1 M-class >> flares which occur quite frequently. > >If good conditions are coming they have not arrived yet. However, it >might be a case that it gets bad before it gets better.