Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.20000228103047.2e9fb136@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 10:30:47
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
From: "Rik Strobbe" <rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.ac.be>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 136kHz weak signals
In-reply-to: <4.1.20000226215521.00a0a100@mailer.inrete.it>
References: <1996011005584468199@zetnet.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

I had the same idea as Marco, or was it the first EME (moonbounce) signal
heard on 136kHz (.... ..)

73, Rik

At 22:11 26/02/00 +0100, you wrote:
>In 22.05 26/02/00 , Peter G3LDO wrote:
>...
>>
>>It turned out to be sending the same data as GM3YXM/P but with a 
>>mystery delay timing difference of around three seconds.
>>
>
>Hello Peter,
>
>SPECTRAN takes some time to process the input signal, maybe three
>seconds with your setting. Then the processed signal becomes available
>on the line and speaker out of the S/B. 
>
>Possibly it is an audio signal re-entering the input of the S/B. I am not
>able to explain the frequency difference, however; but it may be due to
>the signal processing. I will ask Alberto I2PHD.
>
>But you may try with a local QRSS signal. If the cause is the S/B-software
>system it should be easy to detect. Otherwise... echoes from a 
>trans-dimensional alien mothership?
>
>
>73 - Marco IK1ODO
>
>spin@inrete.it
>
>Rivalta, ITALY JN35SA (N 45 01' 25.6", E 7 31' 09.4", Loran-C fix)
>
>
>
>