Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.20000119192818.2217d2ba@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 19:28:18
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
From: "Rik Strobbe" <rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.ac.be>
Subject: Re: LF: Signals strengths in OH
In-reply-to: <3.0.6.32.20000119184203.008a6720@laatikko.saunalahti.fi>
References: <3886075C.722287E4@netscapeonline.co.uk><000501bf61c3$f89b2f60$393801d5@dave>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

I agree. I reported the systematic difference in signalstrenght of OH1TN
(often 10dB or more) in the UK versus Belgium already in 1998. It is also
remarkable that this difference in much less (or even dissapears) at days
of high magnetic activity (high 'A-values' in the solar reports).

73, Rik  ON7YD

At 18:42 19/01/00 +0200, you wrote:
>Fellows,
>
>Now that G3KEV mentioned it (see below) there must be
>some secret in latitudinal location in addition to
>equipment available, power, antenna etc.
>
>I listen to 136 kHz day after day and leaving out
>OH3LYG and OH1TN (in this order) MM0ALM is always the
>strongest "DX" and G3KEV comes next. What say?
>PS  SM6PXJ is not bad either...
>
>OH2LX, PJ2/OH2LX (1st /OH0 in Aland Island in 1954), hi.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>-- G3KEV wrote: ------------------------------------------
>>Your neighbour G3XDV in his report dated Jan 16th, heard you at 329
>>so except the wind happens to be in the right direction >I probably
>>will not hear you. Who are the less well equipped >stations at
>>comparable distance that are hearing you? I am the most Northern
>>active in England until you get to MM0ALM near Aberdeen.
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------
>V.K.Lehtoranta, OH2LX, POBox 50, FIN-05401 Jokela, Finland
>------ Tel: +358-9-4173965 ---- Fax: +358-9-4173961 ------
>E-mail: vaiski@dlc.fi - alias: oh2lx@dlc.fi & oh2lx@sral.fi
>
>