Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10561 invoked from network); 15 Dec 1999 10:03:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by 212.159.2.33 with SMTP; 15 Dec 1999 10:03:21 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11yBfG-0003wU-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 10:28:10 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.6]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11yBfF-0003wP-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 10:28:09 +0000 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id KAA05906 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 10:55:56 +0100 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.19991215115451.2edfbc5c@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:54:51 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: Re: LF: Lowfer's Net - sunday 12 december In-reply-to: <38569271.DAD4DFA9@netscapeonline.co.uk> References: <24497017.945099415550.JavaMail.imail@bronty><3855453F.152AF742@netscapeonline.co.uk><005f01bf45a7$5b2b90e0$0600a8c0@main> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Uhm ... with the attitude that the 'commercials' and 'proffessionals' do everything better and the we 'poor amateurs' shouldn't try anything else, we would still be using AM instead of SSB, would never have amateur-satellites that had much longer live in orbit most commercial satellites etc ... Of course we should not ignore the experience of the profs but the day we stop experimenting and looking for alternative ways ham-radio looses a major reason of its existence. About 2 years ago, when I started with LF, I talked with an engeneer with long year experience in broadcasting. When I told him about our 1W ERP limit he laughed and said that I never would get any further than 10, maybe 20km. The distance record is meanwhile over 2200km. So don't stop experimenting, regardless wether it is about isolators, alternative antennas or alternative transmission modes. That we often have to 'get of the beaten track' is one the things I like most on LF. 73, Rik ON7YD At 18:54 14/12/99 +0000, you wrote: >Re - experimenters band. >The Broadcaster fraternity and Admirality engineers pioneered, and have been >using the Low frequencies for 50 years very successfuly. We Radio Amateurs in >1999 are merely re-inventing the WHEEL and have a long way to go to catch up >with the commercial achievements. It is back to basic theory and interesting as >long as one understands its limitations for the average radio amateur with a >small back garden and very poor antenna, and limited ERP. >73 de Mal/G3KEV