Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8380 invoked from network); 22 Nov 1999 10:15:19 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 22 Nov 1999 10:15:19 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11pqLY-0002CG-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:05:20 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from mailserv.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.8.44]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11pqLX-0002CB-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 10:05:19 +0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mailserv.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id LAA12664 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 1999 11:12:31 +0100 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.19991122120433.232f2314@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 12:04:33 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: Re: LF: Re: new version of QRS supports FDK In-reply-to: <199911192010.HAA01410@mailman.zeta.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: My appologies to Steve for 'stealing' his FDK, it was not my intention. I got to term FDK (Frequency Difference Keying) via DF8ZR (see his webpage) and it seemed better suited to me than VCW (Visual CW), as this is a more 'general term' that applies to all modes that are 'decoded by eye'. Therefore I suggest the term Dual Frequency CW (DFCW) instead. 73, Rik ON7YD