Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18628 invoked from network); 16 Mar 1999 15:24:03 -0000 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by medusa.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 16 Mar 1999 15:24:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 32423 invoked from network); 16 Mar 1999 15:26:17 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (194.75.130.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 16 Mar 1999 15:26:17 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from troy.blacksheep.org ([194.75.183.50] ident=root) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10MvfB-000758-01; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 15:21:49 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA22022 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 15:18:05 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (root@post.unica.co.uk [194.75.183.70]) by troy.blacksheep.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id PAA21960 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 15:16:40 GMT Received: from mailserv.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.8.44]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #3) id 10MvdM-00073n-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 15:19:57 +0000 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mailserv.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id QAA13595 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:20:06 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.19990316161448.12e7e406@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> X-Sender: pb623250@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:14:48 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: Re: LF: Care and feeding of a top-loaded vertical In-reply-to: <199903070720.SAA28683@godzilla.zeta.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org At 18:24 7/03/99 +1100, VK2ZTO wrote: >... >The antenna configuration I have decided to attempt first is a >capacitively-loaded vertical mounted on the roof of the house. This is the >only tree-free area on the block. The loading coil I want to place as far >up as possible to maximise the current in the vertical part of the antenna. > Elevated radials will cover the roof as far as possible around the base of >the antenna and connect to surrounding metal roofs, sheds, chook runs and >an aviary and also to ground. > >A picture of this can be found at: > >http://www.zeta.org.au/~ollaneg/images/AXSO_ant.gif >... Hello Steve & LF gang, I had a look at the picture on your web-page and it reminded me of an (unsuccesfull) attempt to improve my LF antenna. At my QTH it was not the house but some smaller (5m high) trees under the antenna that I tried to 'screen' with some elevated radials. In the beginning I was very confused by the result, as putting radials over the trees increased the antennacurrent from 0.72A to 0.90A but decreased (!) the signalstrength by about 2dB instead of the increase of 2dB that could be expected based on the higher antennacurrent. Trying to find an explenation for this 4dB 'deficit' I came to the conclusion that elevated radials not only screened the lossy trees (and increased the antennacurrent) but also elevated the hight of the 'virtual ground' (and lowered the effective height of the antenna). So in my case these elevated radials gave a gain of 2dB by increasing antennacurrent but at the same time also a loss of 4dB by lowering the effective height of the antenna, so overal 'gain' was -2dB. Of course it is not sure that you will come to the same result when screening the house but I just want to warn that an increase in antennacurrent not always means an increase in ERP. 73, Rik ON7YD Rik Strobbe ON7YD rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.ac.be Villadreef 14 B-3128 Baal BELGIUM (JO20IX)